|
| |
Lindane
A chemical of the past persists in the future
Introduction
Lindane is an organochlorine insecticide that is
still in relatively widespread use in developed nations as well as in the third
world. Many other organochlorines which over the years have been linked to major
health and environmental problems have been banned or are no longer used.
Included in this catalogue are aldrin, dieldrin and endrin which have virtually
disappeared, and DDT, heptachlor and toxaphene which have been banned in many
countries but are still used quite extensively particularly in some developing
countries.
Lindane is also known as gamma-HCH
since it is made up of at least 99% of the gammaisomer of
hexachlorocyclohexane (HCH). 'Technical HCH' can include varying proportions of
alpha, beta, delta and epsilon HCH isomers which have been shown to have serious
short and long term health effects.
While gamma-HCH and other isomers of
HCH were isolated in the 19th century (lindane was first prepared by Faraday in
1825), the insecticidal properties of lindane were not recognised until the
early 1940s; about the same time as DDT was developed. Lindane has been in use
as an insecticide for nearly 50 years.
The organochlorines in general, and
lindane in particular, are characterised by their broad spectrum insecticidal
activity, long persistence in the environment, and their tendency to
bio-accumulate along food chains.
The mode of action of lindane on
insects is generally as a stomach poison with some fumigant action, that is it
kills insects that ingest it or inhale its vapour. It kills insects by
stimulating the central nervous system causing trembling, hyperexcitation, loss
of coordination, paralysis, and eventually death. Although lindane acts on the
nervous system of insects it is not a cholinesterase inhibitor as are the
organophosphate insecticides, which were originally developed as nerve gases.
The physiological mode of action of lindane is not well understood - it just
works well as an insecticide.
Lindane as a global issue
Lindane is manufactured in India, US, Japan,
and China. The raw active ingredient is formulated into hundreds of commercial
products around the world. Although it has been banned for all uses in 7
countries, severely restricted in another four. Under the Prior Informed Consent
(PIC) procedures, a further 23 countries have prohibited its import.
Lindane is one of the 27 pesticides on
the PIC list. PIC is an international procedure which requires exporters of
certain particularly hazardous chemicals to inform the importing country of the
chemical's legal status and its hazards. The process has recently changed from a
voluntary code to an internationally binding convention. The purpose of PIC is
to allow developing nations to make informed decisions about whether or not they
wish to allow the import of hazardous chemicals.
Lindane is a Persistent Organic
Pollutant (POP) candidate. The POP Convention which will shortly start to be
negotiated will seek to phase out the production and use of a range of chemicals
which are classified as Persistent Organic Pollutants. Concern over these
derives from the fact that many are used in tropical zones, but percolate
through the globe environment to end up in cold regions such as Scandinavia,
Canada and Antarctica. POP pesticides include many which have been banned in
several countries and some whose production is believed to have ceased
world-wide. Lindane is not currently in the list of POPs, but its inclusion has
been proposed. This is likely to be resisted by industry and some governments
who believe no alternatives exist to its use in some situations.
In the third world, lindane is used for
the control of a broad spectrum of plant-eating and soil-dwelling pests, public
health pests and animal ectoparasites. Being an old chemical with no remaining
patents it is relatively cheap, and its persistence is often seen as advantage
in pest control rather than an environmental hazard.
Toxic effects
As with any other pesticide active ingredient,
toxicity trials carried out in laboratories reveal a range of acute and chronic
health effects. Acute exposure mainly effects the central nervous system with
manifested symptoms including vomiting and diarrhoea followed by convulsions.
Exposure to small amounts by skin contamination or ingestion have been known to
lead to headaches, nausea, dizziness, tremors and muscular weakness. Lindane is
classified by the World Health Organisation (WHO) as 'moderately hazardous' and
has an oral LD50 in the rat of 88
mg/kg(1). This means that a dose of
88mg of lindane administered orally for each kg of body weight (bw) will kill
50% of a sample population of rats. Human volunteers ingesting a dose of 17
mg/kg have experienced severe toxic symptoms, and a lethal dose to an adult
would be in the region of 0.7 - 1.4 g(2).
Several cases of human poisoning by
lindane have been reported. Children are significantly more susceptible to the
toxic effects of lindane. In one case a dose equivalent to 62.5 mg/kg proved
fatal, while the LD50 in the rat is
above 88 mg/kg. In adults, doses above 300 mg/kg ingested orally have proved
fatal(3).
Since lindane has been in very
widespread use for several decades, its long term health effects have been
extensively studied. Included among the reported chronic effects of exposure to
lindane are nervous disorders and increased liver weight.
Trials to ascertain its carcinogenic
potential have showed an increased incidence of benign and malignant liver
tumours in mice when fed with doses of up to 600 mg/kg, but other animals did
not produce such conclusive results(4).
The international Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) has concluded that
lindane is a possible human carcinogen (class 2B), and the US EPA has classified
it similarly as a class B2/C possible human carcinogen.
Exposure to lindane
As well as occupational exposure of workers who use
lindane, and environmental exposure through residues which persist in the
environment, new data demonstrates people may be exposed to lindane in
surprisingly high quantities.
The Acceptable Daily Intake (ADI) for
lindane which has been determined by the international authority on food
residues, Codex Alimentarius, is 0.001 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) of body
weight. For a 60 kg adult therefore the maximum daily dose should not exceed
0.06 mg in total. The ADI was changed in 1997 from a previously less stringent
figure of 0.008 mg/kg.
Recent data published by Codex
Alimentarius shows that a person consuming an average local diet in any region
of the world will exceed the ADI for lindane by between 3.8 and 12 times. The
highest consumption of lindane in food occurs in Europe where a theoretical
maximum daily intake of lindane in a typical European diet would reach 0.742 mg,
or 1237% of the ADI. The highest intake of lindane is likely to occur from
consumption of cereals, red meat and tomatoes(5).
Key health issues
Aplastic anaemia
Exposure to lindane has been linked with blood
disorders known as blood dyscrasias, and in particular the disorder aplastic
anaemia where the formation of platelets and white cells is disrupted. A great
deal of work has been produced both proposing and refuting a possible link
between blood dyscrasias and exposure to lindane. However, an extensive review
carried out by the UK Advisory Committee on Pesticides (ACP)(6)
has concluded that there is no conclusive link, but that in certain cases the
development of the disease may be an idiosyncratic response to exposure to
lindane. In many of the cases where patients who developed blood dyscrasias were
exposed to lindane, they were also exposed to other pesticides. The ACP
therefore concludes that lindane cannot be directly held responsible for causing
the illness. The International Programme on Chemical Safety does not carry out
an extensive review of the literature but reports that a number of cases of
childhood aplastic anaemia were reputed to have been caused by lindane(7).
CHARGE
This condition which involves multiple congenital
abnormalities has been linked to exposure of the mothers of CHARGE children to
lindane during early pregnancy. A statistically significant proportion of
mothers of CHARGE children in the UK were exposed to pesticides in early
pregnancy, and one of the most prominent pesticides implicated was lindane(8).
This issue was addressed by the Health
and Safety Executive (HSE)(9) and
in a parliamentary debate(10). HSE
concluded that since mothers of CHARGE children were exposed to other chemicals
in addition to lindane, no direct link can be proven. In the parliamentary
debate where the issue was raised, no response was given by the Government.
Breast cancer
Lindane is an endocrine disruptor which is capable of
imitating certain hormones in humans and thereby disrupting the physiological
functions which these hormones control. There is a significant body of evidence
which suggests that where lindane is used extensively, and particularly where
cattle are exposed to it, the incidence of breast cancer is higher. The UK has
one of the highest rates of death from breast cancer in the world, and in
Lincolnshire where lindane is used extensively on sugar beet crops, the
incidence rate of breast cancer is 40% higher than the national average(11).
In 1995, the Green Network (Lincoln,
UK) sent a breast cancer petition with 17,000 signatures to the European
Parliament. It reflected the great public concern about breast cancer and the
use of lindane in Lincolnshire.
The UK Government has announced a
breast screening programme with the aim of reducing the high rate of mortality
from breast cancer. However, on current evidence there is no acceptance on the
part of the Government that lindane is responsible for causing breast cancer(12).
The presence of lindane in human milk
has been reported in countries throughout the world(13).
Lindane residues are similarly detectable in cows milk and it is therefore clear
that children, who have already been described as being more susceptible to the
toxic effects of lindane, are ingesting the chemical from birth, and probably
from conception. Recent surveys of lindane in cows milk carried out by the
UK-MAFF Working Party on Pesticide Residues (WPPR) have revealed detectable
residue levels in 100% of 216 samples taken. Of these over 4% exceeded the
Maximum Residue Limit (MRL)(14).
Environmental effects
Lindane is highly volatile, and when applied to field
crops in particular, a high proportion (up to 90%) of the pesticide enters the
atmosphere and is later deposited by rain. Concentrations of 5.5mg/l of lindane
were detected in rain in Oxfordshire in 1992(15).
Lindane is also leached into surface waters and even into ground water. For
example, lindane contravened legally permissible limits in drinking water
supplied by North West Water on two occasions in 1993(16).
It has been found in increasing concentrations in the marine environment, and
particularly in the North Sea(17).
The International Conference on the
Protection of the North Sea agreed to reduce emissions from land, rivers and the
atmosphere of a number of toxic chemicals including lindane by 50% between 1985
and 1995. Implementation of this agreement in the UK is in the form of the 'red
list' which includes lindane (gamma-HCH). The UK failed to meet its reduction
targets, and that in fact emissions of lindane to the North Sea from the UK
increased by up to 50% between 1990 and 1991(18).
Figures published by the National Rivers Authority (NRA) (now part of the
Environment Agency) show that total discharges of lindane from rivers to the
North Sea increased between 1992 and 1993(19).
Lindane has also been detected in the North Pacific, Persian Gulf, Arabian Sea,
Red Sea, Western Pacific, Indian Ocean, Antarctic Ocean and Arctic Ocean(20).
In common with other organochlorine
pesticides lindane is fat soluble and this contributes to its tendency to
bioaccumulate through food chains. Residues have been detected in the kidneys,
livers and adipose tissue of a wide variety of wild animals and birds. It is
highly toxic to aquatic invertebrates and fish
Regulatory status:
On
13 July 2000 the European Union Standing Committee on Plant Health voted for
a ban on lindane with the support from UK and other Member States. The
European Commission ratified the decision in December 2000, which should
come into effect by the end of 2001. The ban will cover all agricultural and
amateur gardening uses of lindane.
The following countries have banned lindane
for all uses(21):
| Country |
Year |
Reasons for actions taken |
| Finland |
1998 |
High risk to human health and the environment |
| Indonesia |
1985 |
May induce adverse effects to environment and human
health |
| Korea |
1986 |
Harmful to human health |
| Netherlands |
1979 |
Persistence of impurities and its high bioconcentration
in the food chain |
| New Zealand |
1990 |
Environmental reasons |
| Saint Lucia |
1987 |
High residual effects in soil water |
| Sweden |
1988 |
Suspected carcinogenic properties and persistence |
The following countries have severely restricted the
use of lindane:
| Country |
Year |
Reasons for actions taken |
| Australia |
|
Environmentally unacceptable due to persistence |
| Austria |
1992 |
High persistence in the environment, its bio-accumulation
in the food chain and in human tissues. Lindane is suspected a suspected
carcinogen. There is evidence that HCH isomers act as a tumour promoter
previously initiated by other chemicals |
| Cyprus |
1987 |
Risk associated with human health and contamination of
the environment due to its persistence and accumulation of residues in
human tissue |
| Norway |
|
All products withdrawn by importer. No import since 1991 |
| Sri Lanka |
1986 |
|
Conclusions
Lindane has been in use long enough for a significant
body of evidence on its toxic and environmental hazards to have built up. It has
cause deaths and poisonings in humans and there is authoritative recognition of
its long term health effects including carcinogenicity. It is a serious
environmental contaminant and as well as being directly toxic to wildlife it
bioaccumulates along food chains. A significant body of scientific and anecdotal
evidence links lindane with serious health problems including aplastic anaemia,
the birth disorder CHARGE and breast cancer.
- References
1. International Programme on Chemical Safety,
The WHO recommended classification of pesticides by hazard and guidelines to
classification 1994-1995, UNEP/ILO/WHO 1994.
2. Brooks G T, Lindane: Faraday's hidden legacy,
Pesticide Outlook 1,4, August 1990.
3. Health and Safety Executive Pesticides
Registration Section, Evaluation on Gamma HCH (Lindane II), Ministry of
Agriculture Fisheries and Food Pesticides Safety Division, December 1992.
4. IARC, IARC monographs on the evaluation of
the carcinogenic risk of chemicals to humans - Some halogenated
hydrocarbons, IARC, October 1979.
5. Codex Alimentarius Commission, Consideration
of intake of pesticide residues: Reports on pesticide residue intake studies
at international and national level based on revised guidelines for
predicting dietary intake of pesticide residues, Reports of 13TH session of
the Codex committee on pesticide residues, FAO/WHO, April 1998.
6. Health and Safety Executive Pesticides
Registration Section, op cit
7. International Programme on Chemical Safety,
Environmental health criteria 124, Lindane, World Health Organization,
Geneva, 1991.
8. Blake, Kim D and David Brown, CHARGE
association looking at the future - the voice of a family support group,
Child care health and development, 1993, 19, 395-409.
9. Health and Safety Executive, 1992, Op cit
10. Mackinlay, Andrew, MP, Parliamentary debate
on Lindane, 31 March 1995
11. Women's Environmental Network, Lindane, WEN,
1994
12. Tom Sackville MP, Under-secretary of state
for Health, in a debate on lindane in the House of Commons, 31 March 1995.
13. Moses, Marion, Pesticides and breast cancer,
Pesticides News 22, December 1993, 3-5
14. Elevated lindane levels in milk, Pesticides
News 32, June 1996, The Pesticides Trust [now PAN UK].
15. Harris GL, et al, Pesticide application and
deposition - their importance to pesticide leaching to surface water,
Proceedings of the Brighton Crop Protection Conference: Pests and diseases -
1992, Volume 2, 477-486, BCPC 1992.
16. Drinking water 1993: A report by the Chief
Inspector, Drinking Water Inspectorate, HMSO, July 1994
17. Lohse, Joachim, Sabine Winterler and Dirk
Susat, Lindane and other pesticides in the North Sea - A reason for concern,
Greenpeace International, 1988.
18. Lyons, Gwynne, Meeting commitments? - A
progress review of the UK's pledge to reduce North Sea inputs of red list
substances by 50%, WWF 1994.
19. National Rivers Authority, Contaminants
entering the sea, HMSO, May 1995.
20. International Programme on Chemical Safety,
1994. Op cit
21. UNEP, Import decisions as of 30 June 1988,
Lindane (CAS:58-89-9).
[This article first
appeared in Pesticides News No.28, December 1995, p28-29,
updated July 2001]
|