Quarterly/June 2006
These articles are free but cost money to make, so please
make a donation and help us with the production costs.
Editorial
UK regulation
Sheep dip banned to
save rivers 3
In the 1990s health concerns over organophosphate sheep dips led to
their partial replacement with the synthetic pyrethroid, cypermethrin.
However, cypermethrin is around a 1,000 times more toxic to
invertebrates[1]. With mounting evidence of its environmental impact
UK sales have temporarily been suspended. Matt Shardlow outlines
the problem and the imperative to make this ban permanent.
New UK strategy avoids
pesticide reduction 5
The UK government finally published its national pesticide strategy in
March of this year. While providing a new policy framework for
moving towards sustainable pest management it remains to be seen
whether it is the right basis for progress. Clare Butler Ellis reports.
Risk assessment
Human testing –
industry lobbying may
increase exposure 6
After pressure from industry the United States Environmental
Protection Agency recently published new rules on human pesticide
testing ending a moratorium on the use of such studies. Brian Hill
reviews recent developments and considers their ethical implications.
EU regulation
The death of strychnine 7
The EU withdrawal of strychnine marks its end as a method of mole
control. While this has got to be applauded there is no guarantee that
the main alternative, lethal traps, will be more humane. Chris Davies
examines the issues and calls on ministers to review laws and draw up
new guidance and training.
UK regulation
Revised code of practice:
public exposure and
rights of way 8
An error in the government’s new Code of Practice for pesticides has
been successfully challenged by PAN UK and Friends of the Earth.
Alison Craig reviews the implications of the new code for people’s
exposure to pesticides, particularly where there are public rights of
way and warns that we could be confronted with a choice of either
having countryside access with unacceptable risks to our health or
protection from pesticides and closed rights of way.
Health
Toxic times – exposure
to multiple chemicals 9
Recognition of multiple chemical sensitivity (MCS) as an illness with
a biological basis is still controversial in the UK. Professor Malcolm
Hooper examines the role of pesticides in the development of MCS
and evidence supporting its recognition.
Pesticides and cancer –
tracing the links 12
Cancer incidence rates are increasing worldwide and may rise by as
much as 50% by 2020. At the same time we have been exposed to a
complex mixture of novel chemicals. There is mounting evidence that
persistent organic chemical contaminants such as pesticides, are
involved in the aetiology of cancer and that these chemicals exert
their effect during critical periods of development, at low,
environmentally relevant levels. Elucidating cause/effect relationships
allowing us to pinpoint the specific chemicals involved is improbable.
John Newby and Vyvyan Howard suggest this may be an appropriate
time for governments to adopt the precautionary principle.
Obsolete stockpiles
Moving the mountain – managing containers 16
Tens of thousands of tonnes of used pesticide containers are
generated every year. In developing countries many find secondary
uses, most notoriously for drinking water. It is vital that systems are
put in place to remove this toxic waste. Mark Davis discusses the
options available and the challenges ahead.
Stopping stockpiles 18
Disposal of obsolete pesticides is a vital first step in eliminating the
hazard of stockpiles. But it can be just as difficult to identify concrete
actions that will prevent future stockpiles. PAN UK is the independent
monitor for the obsolete pesticide project in Mozambique. Eloise
Touni reports on progress being made on prevention work.
Factsheet
Pesticide risk assessment – inadequate for occupational exposure 19
Manufacturers of pesticides are required to submit data to national regulators to allow health and environmental risks to be assessed before pesticides can be registered for use in a country. However, procedures for assessing the hazards of pesticides and the likely worker exposure are incomplete making assessment of risk very uncertain.
Risk
News
22
More poisonings in Chile
Aerial fumigation – Ecuador’s
doctors protest to the UN
UK consults on
food standards
Book reviews 23
Who benefits from GM
crops?
Chemical warfare in
Colombia
Reducing pesticide use in Germany