Robert Repetto
presents evidence from his recent book Pesticides
and the Immune System, which reveals
potential health risks from pesticides. He
discusses the possibility that exposure to
pesticides at work and in the diet increases
susceptibility to infectious diseases and certain
cancers by suppressing the body's normal immune
functions.Exposure
to pesticides can result in acute poisonings,
birth defects, and some types of cancer. Now,
scores of experimental and epidemiological
studies have added immuno-toxicity to this list
of health risks.
More than a hundred
experimental studies using accepted tests have
shown that many widely used insecticides,
herbicides and fungicides can alter the immune
system and suppress normal immune system
responses. These changes can reduce the body's
normal resistance to bacterial, viral and other
infections. Careful studies of diets of
contaminated fish lead toward the same
conclusion.
What evidence there is from the
few epidemiological studies of people exposed to
pesticides reinforces these concerns. For
example, farmworkers in the former Soviet Union,
where pesticides were used heavily, showed immune
system abnormalities and increased rates of
infectious and chronic disease compared to people
living away from districts of heavy pesticide
use. Filipino rice farmers experienced rising
mortality rates when pesticide use increased,
although their wives and non-farming neighbours
did not.
In Northern Canada, native
Americans eat mainly fish and other products in
which organochlorine pesticides can accumulate.
Their babies then take in these chemicals when
breast feeding. It has been found that such
babies show immune system deficiencies and higher
rates of infectious disease compared to
bottle-fed babies. Many such babies cannot even
be vaccinated, since they do not produce
sufficient antibodies.
Though intensive, pesticide use
is levelling off in OECD countries, but it is
still increasing elsewhere. In Latin America, for
example, pesticide use has almost tripled in the
last 20 years, and is expected to continue rising
as production of fruits, vegetables, and other
commercial crops expands.
Asia, whose rice crop alone
accounts for 14% of global pesticide use, also
represents a growing market. Scarce farmland and
economic pressures to boost agricultural
production have resulted in heavy chemical use to
push up yields. After Japan, China and India are
the largest Asian users. Despite substantial
research in China on biological pest control
methods, pesticide production more than doubled
over the past decade to nearly 300,000 tons per
year of active ingredient.
Economic disruption in Central
Europe and the former Soviet Union have led to a
relative decline in pesticide use. Nonetheless
pesticide consumption remains high in many
regions. In 1994, roughly 80,000 tons of active
ingredient were applied. Many of the pesticides
that are still used in these areas have been
banned or restricted in OECD countries and
replaced by compounds that breakdown more quickly
and can be applied in lower doses.
Much can also be done to reduce
unnecessary exposures. Farmworkers are often
exposed by using inadequate equipment or by
handling pesticides carelessly while mixing,
loading or spraying chemicals. Other people are
exposed by being near fields while spraying is
underway, or soon afterwards. Even children are
exposed when pesticide containers are stored
improperly around the house or thrown away
carelessly, or when food is not washed thoroughly
before it is eaten. A recent study in Nicaragua,
for example, found that 40% of farm children had
lowered cholinesterase activity, one measure of
organophosphate pesticide poisoning.
The highest potential health
risks from pesticide immunotoxicity arise in
countries where much of the population still
lives in rural areas and works in agriculture,
where infectious and parasitic diseases are
widespread, and where the coverage of the health
services for rural people is incomplete.
Malnutrition suppresses normal immunity, making
affected people more susceptible to the
consequences of immune suppression if exposed to
pesticides. These conditions are widespread
throughout many parts of the world.
There is enough evidence
linking pesticide exposure to immune system
suppression in laboratory animals, wildlife and
humans to justify much more comprehensive studies
to clarify the risks. Along with further
experimental research, more extensive
epidemiological studies designed specifically to
test for the immuno-suppressive effects of
pesticides on vulnerable populations are needed.
Such studies should be led by the World Health Organisation.
Multilateral and bilateral aid
agencies should support such research and expand
efforts to improve pest management practices.
Development assistance has been heavily invested
in water supply, sanitation, and primary health
care systems around the world to reduce the
incidence of infectious diseases. Complementary
programmes to eliminate environmental threats to
the immune system could be a cost-effective
method to insure the success of these on-going
efforts. Pesticides now on the market should be
tested much more thoroughly for their effects on
the immune system. Testing requirements in most
countries have not kept pace with advances in
immunologic knowledge and technique.
The over-riding concern,
however, is public health. Infectious diseases
account for most deaths in developing countries.
If pesticides can weaken the immune system, then
mortality rates from common infectious diseases
may be much higher than need be but the added
risks stemming from chemical exposure could
easily remain undetected. Current knowledge
warrants new research programmes and
precautionary actions.
Robert Repetto and Sanjay S. Baliga, Pesticides and the immune system: the public health risks, WRI Publications, PO Box 4852, Hampden Station, Baltimore, MD 21211, US, Tel. +1 410 516 6963, Fax +1 410 516 6998.
Robert Repetto is the Vice President of World Resources Institute, Washington DC, US.
[This article first appeared in Pesticides News No. 32, June 1996, page 15]