Disposal dilemma 
- A persistent sheep dip problem

Recently, attention has focused on the health hazards of using sheep dips, but pollution hazards also arise from the disposal of these chemicals. Robin Maynard outlines the environmental damage caused by sheep dip disposal, the inadequate and contradictory advice given to farmers, and suggests alternative strategies.

An estimated 200 million litres (equivalent to the contents of 450 municipal swimming pools) of sheep dip is disposed of each year from around 50,000 dipping facilities. Data from the Soil Association suggests that dips from about 2,000 facilities are discharged directly into water courses, and over 25,000 operators use the soakaway method of disposal where chemical is allowed to soak into the ground near to the dip facility.
   
       Sheep dip is generally used by immersing the sheep in baths holding 2,000-2,500 litres of dip solution. These baths may be emptied in a number of ways:

Although the Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (MAFF) apparently holds such information as part of its agricultural census data gathering, there are no official publicly available figures as to the number, the location, the type or the condition of sheep dipping facilities in the UK.

The chemicals used
Three organophosphate (OP) active ingredients: diazinon, chlorfenvinphos and propetamphos accounted for 75% of dips sold at the time of the initial Soil Association research. Since then it is likely that farmers have increasingly switched to synthetic pyrethroids. At present therefore, the probable ratio of OPs to synthetic pyrethroids used is about 50:50.

High pollution risk
The most detailed study to date carried out by the Tweed River Purification Board (TRPB) in Scotland found damage to river ecosystems downstream of the disposal of OP sheep dips. The study found:

EC action on groundwater pollution
The UK government is currently subject to infringement proceedings from the European Commission over a complaint about groundwater pollution from OP sheep dip. This decision reflects the Commission's concern that groundwater resources should be fully protected in accordance with Council Directive 80/68/EEC. As a result, the Commission says there is inadequate application of the Directive in relation to sheep dip disposal.

Inconsistent and impractical advice
Currently, advice to farmers is contradictory, and the preferred method of disposal is prohibitively expensive. The Veterinary Medicines Directorate (VMD), which provides official advice, suggests sheep farmers dispose of dip by incineration through a reputable specialist waste contractor. Soil Association research found that very little information was available from waste authorities on how to follow such instructions. On the rare occasion a contractor was identified, the costs of disposal averaged £1,000 per bath of dip.
    There is conflicting advice with regards to soakaways (the next best option after incineration). The latest recommendation of the Veterinary Products Committee (VPC) of the VMD states: "While soakaways should not be generally recommended for disposal, they might be deemed safe in certain circumstances." This appears to contradict MAFF's Code of Good Agricultural Practice for the Protection of Water which states: "Soakaways are not suitable in most places as they could pollute groundwater." As an alternative, the Code advises: "Spread used dip onto land at low application rates." Yet, the VPC admits this latter strategy is a compromise based on economics and expediency, not on environmental good practice.
    The VPC concluded: "The recommendation to spread dip wash onto a suitable area of land was agreed after much heart searching and only because there did not appear to be a viable alternative for farmers."

Doing without dips?
Organic sheep farmers have developed husbandry strategies to minimise or do without the use of  chemicals to control sheep scab or problems from fly-strike.
    Organic sheep farmers are however permitted to use limited amounts of the synthetic pyrethroid flumethrin to control sheep scab, which therefore means some disposal issues are as relevant for organic as for conventional sheep farming. The Soil Association has carried out a number of  surveys among organic sheep farmers because of concern over this issue. Two conclusions can be drawn. First, it is possible to manage sheep organically without the use of dipping, given the right conditions and a sufficient level of husbandry. Second however, flumethrin may be advantageous, or even necessary, in some circumstances and it is clear that organic farmers are then faced with equal problems when disposing of the spent dip. In response, the Soil Association has introduced a requirement to mix the spent dip with slaked lime 28 days before disposal, as the increase in pH has the effect of neutralising the flumethrin.

Recommendations
Patrick Holden, director of the Soil Association, concluded: "Our research confirms that sheep dip disposal represents one of the least monitored and controlled farm pollution hazards. Neither the (previous) government or the manufacturers have provided farmers with the means or advice to dispose of them safely."
    As a result of these concerns the organisation recommends:

Sheep Dip Disposal: No room for complacency, Soil Association, Bristol House, 40 - 56 Victoria Street, Bristol, BS1 6BY, Fax, +44 (0)117 925 2504, 1997, £9, 33pp. (Researchers: Karen McVeigh, Dervila O'Brien, John Skelton, Consultants: Dr Gordon Halliday and John Newton, Production: Tim Weisselberg)

Robin Maynard is Local Campaigns Director at Friends of the Earth and was formerly Campaigns Director at the Soil Association.

[This article first appeared in Pesticides News No. 36, June 1997, page 11]