|
| |
The State of Water in the US
The
Council for Agricultural Science and Technology (CAST), a US science-policy
think tank, has produced a paper Pesticides in Surface and Ground Water
which provides a succinct overview of pesticide residues in the sources of human
drinking water in the US. The report cites areas of the corn belt and the
south-eastern coastal plain where intensive use of pesticides has led to the
detection of atrazine, aldicarb, DBCP, EBD and dacthal. Until relatively
recently, ground water was not widely analysed and it is not generally known how
long these pesticides have been present.
Pesticides in excess
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has
developed a database on ground water analysis in which 65,865 wells were
sampled, between 1971 and 1991. Of these, 14.4% (9,509) had concentrations of
one or more pesticides in excess of health standards. Although indicative of
problems, the high percentage reflects sampling bias as wells were sought for
testing where pesticide leaching occurred. Recent US Geographical Survey results
show that surface water, particularly lakes and rivers in the corn belt, contain
residues of major pesticides used on corn and soybean. These include atrazine,
alachlor and cyanazine which produce high levels in the two to three months in
spring/early summer during application.
It is clear that health standards are sometimes exceeded.
Pesticide levels often range from 1 to 10 parts per billion (ppb) and sometime
go up to 100 ppb. These may seem minuscule, however, maximum contamination
levels (MCLs) [.i.e. lifetime exposure levels] for drinking water are often in
the 1 to 1,000 ppb range, depending on the active ingredient. Some species
can show much greater sensitivity as there are insecticides which are toxic to
aquatic invertebrates at less than 0.01 ppb.
Wildlife impact widespread
The EPA is also maintaining a database on incidents
involving pesticide-related fish and bird kills. It suggests that these
incidents are more widespread than was generally thought. Overall knowledge of
the true extent of kills is sketchy and little is known about the toxicology and
environmental fate of pesticide breakdown products, which may be more widespread
than the original active ingredients.
Conclusion
The CAST report says that measures should be taken to
minimise or eliminate exposure to pesticides. In effect this means widening
safety margins. It was recommended that residues must be identified and
fluctuations in concentrations established. “We must be vigilant for early
warning signs of damage to ecological systems. We must seriously consider every
claim on human illness. Finally, the science of pesticide safety, and the
regulatory system based on that science, must continue to advance. Much
improvement is needed” the clarion call of CAST concludes.
Pesticides in Surface and Ground Water,
Council for Agricultural Science and Technology, Issue Paper No 2, April 1994.
[This
article first appeared in Pesticides News No. 24, June 1994, page 15] |