|
| |
Pesticide Reduction at Kew Botanic Gardens
The Royal Botanic Gardens at Kew has a mission to ensure better
management of the environment by increasing knowledge and understanding of the
plant kingdom—the basis of life on Earth. This is achieved through world-wide
research into plants and the ecosystem, publication, access to all knowledge so
gained for the world’s scientific community, and through the display and
interpretation to the public of the collections at Kew in London and Wakehurst
Place in Sussex. David Buffin has explored these ideals with Fiona Dennis
of Kew to see how they relate to the practical implementation of integrated pest
management using, in particular, biological control and the reduction in
pesticide use.
In recent years, there has been a move
towards greater emphasis on biological control at Kew, according to Fiona
Dennis, Senior Botanical Horticulturist in the Herbaceous Section. Biological
control programmes are now in their fourth year at Kew, and ninth year in the
non-public experimental Jodrell Glass areas. The implementation of biological
control has been centralised in order to minimise duplication and standardise
practices and purchases of biological control agents.
Environmental commitment
As part of Kew’s corporate strategic plan there is a
commitment to develop an ‘environmentally sympathetic charter’. The charter
would include a commitment to the existing audits on energy use, health
and safety, noise and toxic waste, and to continue developing projects on
biological control, water conservation and waste recycling. There is a strategy
to undertake experiments and to support scientific study on the efficacy agents
introduced into the glass houses. “As far as possible, Kew does not use
chemical pest control and when it is used, we select only those with the least
persistent active ingredient.” There may also be some occupational
health and safety benefits from using these products. Biological control
will be used as a primary method in all public display glass houses and
nurseries. Guidelines are currently under review.
Examples of biological control
-
In the non-public research glass houses Chinese
painted quail were introduced to control grubs. They were found to be more
interested in weed seeds and have also become a biological weed control agent.
This highlights the fact that Kew has the capacity to be experimental and
innovative, with results which benefit commercial horticultural operations by
the publication of findings.
-
In the temperate glass houses, black tea thrips are a major
pest causing severe damage to plants. Biological control agents Amblyseius
and Orius have been used with little effect to date. The reasons for this are
still to be determined and this is undergoing continual review. The most
effective method to reduce infestation proved to be cultural control, including
pruning out large colonies of affected areas. On the other hand, broad
mite was successfully controlled by Amblyseius. Sticky traps are used to monitor
pests—attracted by their bright yellow colour. One potential problem here
occurs if the predators also come to a sticky end.
-
Companion planting has been adopted. The plant
Convulvulus
tricolor has been found to attract hover flies. These in turn attack aphids. The
aphids can spread debilitating viruses to plants. By placing the Convulvulus
tricolor above a plant susceptible to aphids, the attracted hover flies
will help to control them.
-
In the Princess of Wales Conservatory brown lizards have been
introduced, unknown to, and (because of their shy nature) generally unseen
by, the public, to pick off insect pests which attack the precious plant
collection. Frogs and toads may be introduced in the future to carry out similar
tasks.
Cockroaches
Cockroaches are a problem at Kew, although being
nocturnal they are not often seen by the public. They thrive in the warmth of
glass houses and attack leaf and root tips and flowers. There is also a public
health concern as they can harbour diseases. The main form of control
remains chemical. Sticky traps to capture cockroaches have been tried, but the
synthetic pyrethroid cypermethrin remains their most effective control tool.
Research into the identification and life cycles of cockroaches is being
undertaken to determine if the pest can be eradicated using an integrated pest
management control system.
Training in IPM and biological
control
A pilot training programme began in 1993. Integrated
pest management and biological control are knowledge-based systems. Information
and monitoring are essential for success. Factors such as pest/predator biology
including life-cycle analysis, periods of greatest activity and environmental
requirements such as temperature and moisture, are key. The diversity of the
plants grown is such that the interactions can give surprising results and these
pose many challenges to horticulturists at Kew. Continual observations are
needed to monitor the pests to determine their relationships with specific plant
groups. This may include plants which have in-built physiological deterrents
which need further research input. All relevant staff are required to:
-
have the skill to identify accurately the
pests and their predators;
-
know what appropriate remedial action
should be taken when faced with a pest problem;
-
design a biological programme for the
year stating when likely biological control agents will be
required and how much would be required.
 |
Mark Flanagan and Andrew Jackson of Wakehurst Place putting down one
of the hundreds of PLANTEX tree mats used around new tree plantings.
Photo: PLANTEX
|
‘Plantex’ reduces herbicide use
Plantex is widely used at Kew for non-chemical weed
control. It is a porous fabric made of polyurethane that allows air and water to
permeate through to the soil whilst preventing weed growth. It is
light, easy to lay, and when covered with mulch will last for over 15 years
(without a cover it would last five years) . It is now specified and used by
many local authorities, architects, landscapers, utility and amenity companies.
After a successful five-year trial Plantex has become one of
the first products to receive a full commercial endorsement from Kew, running
for three years from 1993. The original trial started in 1988 at Wakehurst
Place, Kew’s estate in Sussex. Mark Flanagan, Deputy Curator, had the
task of replacing trees lost during the heavy storms of 1987. He felt it was an
ideal time to start a long term assessment of the use of mulch mats around new
tree plantings. The aim was to reduce weed competition and help retain moisture
in the ground. Water conservation is important at Kew because of the poor water
retentive properties and a free draining soil. It would be in keeping with the
reduction in the need for irrigation as part of Kew’s environmental strategy.
The initial assessment for six months, using several different products,
resulted in Plantex being chosen for the full five year evaluation. During this
time the use of the product was extended to include the gardens at Kew under the
supervision of Tony Kirkham, Supervisor of the North Arboretum. “Considering
the rarity of our trees, and the effort required to obtain them, the use of
Plantex has certainly reduced any losses we might have expected” he said.
According to the manufacturers, Du Pont, chemical herbicides
can generally be avoided when using Plantex around tree bases. It is still
necessary to use glyphosate, which is applied with a controlled droplet
applicator to further reduce quantities sprayed. Tony Kirkham confirmed chemical
use has been reduced: “Before, we would be using five applications of
glyphosate a year for weed control around young trees. Now, two or less are
required.” These are sprayed around the perimeter of Plantex and
suppress annual weed growth, which may germinate on the top mulch.
[This
article first appeared in Pesticides News No. 24, June 1994, pages 6-7] |