An End to Toxic Buildings? 
New processes and products

For many years the standard treatment for dry rot in buildings in temperate regions has been rather destructive and relied on apparently excessive amounts of toxic chemicals. Part of the reason for this was undoubtedly a lack of knowledge of the physiology of Serpula lacrymans, the causative organism of dry rot. Recent studies on the organism confirm more subtle methods for eradication and control are possible. Current procedures and how new research results might affect these procedures are discussed in this review. By John Palfreyman.

The Himalayas - probable home of the dry rot fungus Serpula lacrymans - where a biolgical control organism may lie?

The causative organism of dry rot, the basidiomycete fungus Serpula lacrymans, is estimated to cause up to £200 million damage to buildings in the UK and comparable amounts in other countries where the organism is active in buildings. In addition incalculable damage is caused to heritage buildings where the actual fabric of the building is itself of great historic importance. Traditional methods for treatment of outbreaks of dry rot have taken little account of the highly specialised nature of the organism which, as has often been commented upon by research scientists, is not easy to grow in the laboratory and is very rare in nature. Why then should a relatively sensitive organism be the cause of such distress in the building situation? Firstly, given the correct environmental conditions, the organism can be spectacularly destructive, much more so than other comparable fungi. Secondly, unlike other wood decay basidiomyctes found commonly in buildings simple drying of the area of wood infected by S. lacrymans is not sufficient to kill the organism. It can survive localised drying by colonising/gaining access to neighbouring areas that retain elevated moisture levels. This combination of the aggressive nature of S. lacrymans and its refractoriness to simple environmental control measures has lead to a reliance on the use of toxic chemicals.
    Chemicals used to inhibit, or destroy, wood decay fungi have certain characteristics which may make them seem environmentally suspect. They need to be persistent, and also highly toxic to organisms which are capable of initiating complex degradative processes. Also, because wood is in many instances a relatively low value primary resource, preservatives need to be cheap which itself imposes constraints on the types of chemical which can be used.
    Concepts and principles from the field of wood preservation have very definitely had an affect on operations in the remedial treatment industry. However the needs of the two industries are, or at least should be rather different. The preservative industry needs persistent and toxic chemicals specifically where timbers are to be kept in high hazard class situations. However timber in correctly constructed and properly maintained buildings should not need preservation since the conditions which favour decay are generally not desirable in buildings because of adverse effects on health, comfort and other non-wood structural elements of buildings. In practice buildings are not always constructed properly, are sometimes modified inappropriately, not always maintained correctly and often used in ways that favour decay. These factors make the remediation of timber decay in buildings, and particularly the eradication of dry rot, a more difficult task than it would seem to be in theory.

Environmental control 
S. lacrymans, like any other biological entity, needs a specific environment in which to live. Indeed the environmental requirements of S. lacrymans are rather specific. It needs wood with a moisture content around the fibre saturation point (i.e. when there is free moisture in the timber), it cannot survive mildly elevated temperatures (temperatures as low as 30oC have been reported as being lethal), it is sensitive to air movements and requires a relatively high humidity environment and seems to have an absolute requirement for certain metallic elements, the lack of which can effectively prevent it from decaying wood. If any of these requirements are not met the organism will not decay timber and therefore eradication of the organism should be a relatively easy task. Indeed specialist companies in the UK and abroad are now offering services to correct dry rot infestations which rely solely on environmental control; keeping moisture levels in wood low and increasing ventilation to both favour low moisture levels and prevent the build up of high humidity. By inserting remote sensing moisture meters into at-risk timbers, e.g. beneath valley gutters or at the beam ends or in wall plates, it is possible to keep a check on a building without the need for complex and expensive inspection procedures.
    This type of strategy is relevant in many situations and could theoretically be used in every situation. However it requires perfect building maintenance, co-operative users and a check on any structural modifications. As such it would appear likely that there are situations where the efficacy of environmental control could not be guaranteed despite the obvious appropriateness of the strategy. On account of this additional controls are necessary and these may well include the use of chemicals.

Additional strategies
Chemical
Traditional wood preservatives have usually been highly toxic chemicals. However in recent years there has been an increased use of relatively non-toxic boron compounds to protect wood from both insects and fungi(1,2). The increased use of boron compounds has been driven partly by the need to develop less toxic preservatives and partly by the development of new formulations such as glass rods and monoethylene glycol based solutions.
    Currently there is much activity in wood preservation research to find other biocides of low mammalian toxicity. Such chemicals as IPBC (3-iodo-2-propynyl butyl carbamate) and chlorothalonil (a widely used agricultural chemical) may have a role to play in the treatment of dry rot though use of such chemicals and indeed boron compounds, should remain as a secondary line of defence.

Heat treatment
It has been known for many years that the dry rot fungus is peculiarly sensitive to relatively small increases in temperature. This lack of thermo-tolerance, which is reported as a range of different lethal temperature/ period combinations (e.g. any time period between 1 and 6 hours at 40oC), has resulted in the use of whole building heat treatments to eradicate dry rot(3). Total killing of organisms has been shown in this system though it is only the mycelial form of the fungus which is inactivated, active spores still persist. However given an appropriate drying regime for a building these spores are unlikely to germinate and produce destructive mycelia and indeed there are no reported recurrences of dry rot in buildings which have been heat treated. This system has so far only been used in Denmark though its applicability in buildings in other countries seems likely and should be tested.
    It could be argued that environmental control alone is sufficient to kill the dry rot organism and that heat treatment is therefore unnecessary. Heat treatment ensures the organism is rapidly killed at the start of the control procedure and also that any further degradation which might occur during drying is prevented. Of course, as in the case of environmental control more effective building management practices will have to be installed in order to prevent recurrences of dry rot infestations. The failure to maintain rigorous building management practices as a follow-up to heat treatment remains a major concern in the long-term protection of buildings. Currently there is no effective alternative to the use of chemical preservatives in poorly managed buildings or in buildings where constructional properties render it difficult to ensure that wetting of timbers does not occur.

New research on dry rot Serpula lacrymans
In 1989 Thornton, from CSIRO in Melbourne, Australia, published a paper at the International Research Group on Wood Preservation meeting asking why more people do not work with S. lacrymans nowadays(4). Whilst it may be debated whether Thornton was correct in assuming that few people are undertaking research on S. lacrymans it is undoubtedly true that for an organism which causes so much damage relatively few studies had been reported at that time which could assist in the understanding of the growth of the organism and its ability to decay wood. In many areas the major information about S. lacrymans owed much to the work of Richard Falck in the early part of this century(5). Whilst much important work has been undertaken subsequently the application of new techniques and methodologies, which have transformed the biological sciences in the last 20 years, was lacking in research on S. lacrymans.
    As part of the overall research programme of the Scottish Institute for Wood Technology our group initiated studies on S. lacrymans around 1987 and a brief description of some of our studies, and related studies from other groups will indicate that whilst there are still many important areas of research to be initiated some questions about the organism have been answered and new control strategies are being assessed.

Biological control
The concept of using a predator fungus to destroy a detrimental fungus is not new, however it has not been applied to remedial treatment of dry rot until recently. Studies by Doi and Yamada(6) and Score and Palfreyman(7) have indicated that Trichoderma spp. are highly effective at antagonising S. lacrymans in laboratory based systems and field trials are currently underway. Whilst it might seem inappropriate to use a sporulating organism such as Trichoderma to control dry rot there are a number of reasons why such research is important. First biological control might be a highly effective, and cheap, way of preserving buildings which are falling into disrepair due to lack of use and maintenance. Second, by fully understanding the way that Trichoderma antagonises S. lacrymans new control methods may well be identified either based on live organisms (wild type, mutants, or perhaps genetically engineered) metabolites from such organisms or specific chemicals which can induce or mimic effects which occur during lethal interactions.
    The potential biocontrol organisms tested so far have one major disadvantage when it comes to competing with S. lacrymans in the field: they have not been isolated from the same environmental niche as the basidiomycete. To overcome this difficulty, efforts are now being made to isolate potential antagonistic organisms from the Himalayas, the probable natural home of S. lacrymans(8).

Other factors affecting growth and decay
For many years it has been reported by operatives in the field that the dry rot fungus requires certain ions for its activity, in particular calcium ions(9). The reason for this requirement are not fully understood though they may be due to a need for the organism to switch its metabolism from the breakdown of cellulose (in the early stages of colonisation) to the utilisation of the sugars released from the cellulose (later on in the decay process). Recent studies(10) have shown, for the first time, that the requirements reported in the field are also applicable to the decay of wood samples in the laboratory and new control methods may be developed by further analysis of such requirements.

Conclusions
Despite the development of new treatment regimes there is still much information that is required about S. lacrymans if such regimes are to be optimised. Whilst environmental control may be the ultimate objective the limits of such control need to be more fully defined and those parameters which have most lethal effects on the growth of the organism more fully understood. Fortunately the idea that there is only one standard method for treatment of dry rot is becoming understood to be a fallacy and the development of specific treatment regimes for specific situations is now becoming more widespread. To further process a better understanding of S. lacrymans is required and the widespread dissemination of that understanding is essential.

References:
1.Cockcroft R., Levy J.F., Bibliography on the use of boron compounds in the preservative treatment of wood, J. Inst. Wood Sci. 6, p28-37, 1973.
2. Barnes, H.M., Amburgey, T.L., Williams, L.H.,Morrell, J.J., Borates as wood preserving compounds: the status of research in the United States. International Research Group on Wood Preservation, Doc No. IRG/WP.3542, 1989.
3. Koch, A.P., Kjerulf-Jensen, C. and Madsen, B., New experiences with dry rot in Danish buildings, heat treatment and viability tests. International Research Group on Wood Preservation. Doc. No. IRG/WP/1423, 1989.
4. Thornton, J.D., Why don’t more people work with Serpula lacrymans nowadays. A discussion of some of the different approaches to experimenting with this unique fungus. International Research Group on Wood Preservation. Doc. No. IRG/WP/1383, 1989.
5. Hutterman, A., Richard Falck, his life and work. In Serpula lacrymans, fundamental biology and control strategies, Eds Jennings, O.H. and Bravery, A.F. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK, 1991.
6. Doi, S. and Yamada, A., Antagonistic effect of Trichoderma spp. against Serpula lacrymans in the soil treatment test. International Research Group on Wood Preservation. Doc. No. IRG/WP/1473, 1991.
7. Score, A.J., and Palfreyman, J.W., Biological control of the dry rot fungus Serpula lacrymans by Trichoderma spp.: The effects of complex and synthetic media on interaction and hyphal extension rates. International Biodeterioration and Biodegradation (in press).
8. Singh, Jagjit., Bech-Andersen, J., Elbourne, S.A., Singh, S., Walker, B., Goldie, F., Palfreyman, J.W., Koch, A., Origin and spread of dry rot in Europe. A comparative physiology, morphology, genetics & ecology. Proceedings of 1st Int. Conf. on the Development of Wood Science/Technology and Forestry. Missenden Abbey, UK, 1994.
9. Bech-Anderson, J., The dry rot fungus and other fungi in houses. International Research Group on Wood Preservation. Doc. No. IRG/WP/2389, 1991.
10. Palfreyman, J.W., White, N.A., Score, A.J., Phillips, E.M. and Buultjens, T.E.J., The effects of environmental conditions on the growth and decay capacity of the dry rot fungus, Serpula lacrymans. Proceedings of 1st Int. Conf. on the Development of Wood Science/Technology and Forestry. Missenden Abbey, UK, 1994.

Acknowledgements
Many organisations have supported the dry rot research at the University of Abertay Dundee. These include, the Department of Trade and Industry (via a EUREKA grant), the Arthur Quarmby Partnership, Hutton and Rostron Environmental Investigations Ltd., Oscar Faber Applied Research, Historic Scotland and the University itself. The help and enthusiasm of all these organisations is gratefully acknowledged.

John Palfreyman is senior research director at the Scottish Institute for Wood Technology based at the University of Abertay Dundee. Studies reported above from this laboratory have been undertaken by a number of scientists including Dr Anne Vigrow, Alan Score, Dr Heather Glancy, Dr Nia White, Andrew Murphy, Beth Philips and Dr Eldridge Buultjens.

[This article first appeared in Pesticides News No. 25, September 1994, pages 16-17]