Book reviews - Pesticides News No.25

Self-reliant farming
Studies in Latin America and the Caribbean increasingly show that the classical model of agricultural development is unsuitable for small farmers’ conditions. It is strongly dependent on decisions, services and resources from outside the farm and the rural communities. These include credit, fertiliser and pesticide inputs, machinery, agricultural insurance, government pricing policies and marketing support. Yet over 90% of farmers do not have regular access to these facilities. 
    The regional office of the FAO has spent over a decade collecting experiences and practices suitable to small and medium-size farmers’ needs, which can be implemented in spite of the economic crisis they and their countries are undergoing. The resulting book, Development of the Small Farm: from dependency to self-reliance, proposes a greater role for rural families, using productive resources available on their own farms.
    The book accepts the need for external inputs, and makes pertinent policy proposals: for example that rural schools become more rooted in and oriented to local agricultural needs; that machinery manufacturers make appropriate equipment. This is recommended reading for all researchers, educators, professionals and technicians who are asked to promote and help implement the strategy.

  • Development of the Small Farm: From dependency to self-reliance, second edition, Polan Lacki, FAO Regional Office for Latin America and the Caribbean, Avda. Santa Maria 6700, Casilla 10095, Santiago, Chile, 1993.

     

    Papers on ecological agriculture
    A different perspective is presented in papers from a symposium funded by the Ciba Foundation, a charity established by the Swiss agrochemical company, Ciba-Geigy. The Foundation promotes international co-operation in scientific research. This symposium was organised by the Centre for Research on Sustainable Agriculture and Rural Development, Madras, India, in December 1992. The 15 papers reflect: the ecological background of agriculture; general and economic aspects; and specific issues and case studies. Edited discussion follows each paper. Indian agriculture is particularly featured.
        The papers emphasise a long-term view of agriculture, based on greater recognition of farmers as decision makers and on knowledge-inputs not chemical-inputs. This collection is written by some of the leading supporters of sustainable agriculture. The seminar targeted controversial issues: food crops or cash crops; yields without pesticides; insect resistance and resurgence; the point at which chemical intervention should be used; government subsidies for pesticide; the impact of GATT. Refreshingly, many papers directly address women in agriculture, endorsing a slogan used in southern Africa: ‘Meet the farmer and her husband’.

    Crop Protection and Sustainable Agriculture, Ciba Foundation Symposium 177, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK, 1993.

     

    Cultivating knowledge
    The international debate on biodiversity has resulted in renewed interest in the role of farmers and local communities in the management of natural resources and crop genetic diversity. Local crops developed by farmers have made a great contribution to plant breeding genetic resources in the North. In recent years it has become apparent that local crop diversity in the South is threatened by modern varieties promising higher yields. It includes case studies from Africa, Latin America and Asia, documenting the significance of local knowledge and new developments in the field of conservation and the development of local crops. The authors include plant breeders and anthropologists, international researchers and NGO development workers: their common thread lies in placing farmers at the centre of crop development and genetic diversity, and through their challenge to the dominant models in formal crop research.

    Cultivating Knowledge: Genetic diversity, farmer experimentation and crop research, Walter de Boef, Kojo Amanor and Kate Wellard, with Anthony Bebbington (editors), Intermediate Technology, London, 1993, 224 pp, pb £8.95.

     

    Assessment of Danish reduction programme
    The Danish government’s strict pesticide reduction targets are not being met. It is unlikely that the main plank of the programme, a 50% reduction (from 1986 levels) by 1997, will be achieved without a change in tactics, according to the World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF) International. The target was set under the Ministry of Environment’s Pesticide Reduction Plan (see PN 18 pp. 3-4). By 1993, sales of active ingredient had reduced by 30%, but the application frequency had not declined. WWF considers the Danish Government should adopt the following course if the 1997 targets are to be reached:

    The Danish government has tried to develop an ‘environmental risk index’ and a ‘pesticide-load index’ to incorporate differing potential adverse effects of pesticides. The combination of environmental and health effects posed by a large array pesticides, all with different properties, has meant that these criteria are difficult to establish. The government has concluded that it is impossible to create an index that can summarise all the risks posed by  pesticides: nor is it possible to set scientifically based pesticide reduction targets using a pesticide-load index.
        Government and crop advisers and over 80 farmers have formed crop protection groups with the aim of developing and testing methods which could be adopted further—using computer programmes, video and video bulletins, dosage testing areas, application records and registration of pest levels. Overall, participating farmers and advisers agreed that pesticide use can be reduced—but the target of 50% is thought to be unrealistic.

    The pesticide reduction programme in Denmark: Update, WWF International, Christian Ege Jørgensen and Sophie Winther (CASA), Copenhagen, 1994, pp16.

      

    Future of small farms
    The Small Farmers’ Association has produced a 20-minute video. The central message is that small farmers could disappear, robbing the countryside of the intimacy and diversity of small fields, hedgerows and woods, and creating the prairie-like plains of the US and northern France, with the attendant environmental problems, and desertion of rural areas. The video contains both statistical data and anecdotal evidence on the decline in the number of farms and the increased farm size. A disproportionate share of agricultural support goes to large farms. This encourages specialised, industrial farming with heavy capitalisation and minimum labour. Small  farms retain flexibility and maintain the local environment, but the present subsidy structure provides little recognition of their plight, and works against their interests. Small farmers want three changes to CAP: a ceiling on the total subsidy any one farmer can receive;  tapering rates of subsidies;  simpler and more universal environmental payments.

    Saving the Family Farm—the future of small farmers, video £12.50, discussion paper Farming can have a Civilised Future, Small Farmers Association, PO Box 18, Woodbridge, Suffolk, IP13 0QP.

     

    The environmental effects of trade
    The OECD’s Environment Policy Committee established a group in April 1991 to discuss trade and environment issues and make recommendations.  The papers in this book formed the basis for discussions on the potential environmental effects of trade in agriculture, forestry, fisheries, endangered species and transport.  The inclusion of agriculture in the Uruguay Round of multilateral trade negotiations (GATT) caused numerous clashes, as markets were fought over, largely between the US and Europe, while the needs of Third World countries—many of which are virtually dependent on agriculture—were a minor consideration.
        Agriculture, trade and the environment remains a hotly debated area, and these rather dispassionate papers are a useful contribution to the need to properly evaluate the cost of environmental destruction, and to clarifying to what extend trade per se plays a part in degrading the environment.  There is, however, an annoying tendency to take for granted that market mechanisms are central to agricultural and development issues, and it is ‘market failures’ and ‘government policies’ which are alone responsible, and which could therefore be corrected.  To say there is a ‘market failure’, implies that a market can operate free of powerful forces: there is insufficient analysis of investment, export patterns of rich and more powerful countries on the South, the role of transnational corporations, imposition of World Bank and IMF structural adjustment policies. 
        On the other hand, the agriculture paper is fiercely critical of the effect of subsidised inputs which have encouraged environmental destructive agricultural policies, and calls for the application of the polluter pays policy to agriculture. It includes concrete examples of trade flows in agriculture and their environmental impacts, in both developed and developing countries.

    The Environmental Effects of Trade, OECD, Paris, France, 1994, £12.95, 206pp.

     

    Christian Aid presses for safer Colombian flowers
    Colombian flower workers are paying dearly with their health for the millions of blossoms they produce each year for export according to the UK aid agency Christian Aid. Pesticide poisoning—due to the improper use of dangerous, sometimes banned, chemicals—is affecting large numbers of the 700,000 employees of the flower trade. Fainting, nausea, headaches and skin irritations are common complaints. Mothers also say that their children are born with respiratory problems which they say are due to inhaling pesticides during pregnancy. Doctors in one regional hospital report on average 20 cases per day of chronic pesticide-related poisoning and up to five cases of acute poisoning. "They send us back to the greenhouses an hour after fumigation" says one woman, "but the plants are still wet. This is a major factor affecting our health."

    Colombian Flowers: the gift of love and poison, Sarah Stewart, Christian Aid, PO Box 100, London SE1 7RT, UK.

    Drift assessment
    English Nature has produced an account of research it commissioned to look into the effects of spray drift on the environment. The study explains droplet and vapour drift, and factors which govern drift. It describes experiments which measure herbicide damage to a wide range of plant species and insecticide effects on caterpillars and aquatic invertebrates. Results enable the calculation of buffer zones around sites to protect sensitive organisms and habitats.
        This is the most comprehensive direct investigation ever undertaken in the UK on the effects of pesticide drift on plants and animals.

    The environmental effects of pesticide drift, A.S. Cooke, English Nature, Northminster House, PE1 1UA, UK, 1993, £11, 93pp

    Environmental locust control
    The German overseas technical aid organisation GTZ has published an overview of the current status of research more environmentally sensitive locust control. The use of pheromones, juvenile hormone and micro-organisms which attack locusts have been investigated. For many years, persistent chemicals such as dieldrin have been used. Replacement chemicals have not proved effective and therefore the research for alternatives has been stepped up—particularly since the late 1980s.

    New Trends in locust control, GTZ, Postfach 5180, 65726, Ecshborn, Germany, 182pp.

     

    Access to information
    The world food standards organisation Codex Alimentarius Commission (Codex) has produced the report of its 1994 meeting on pesticides. In it, the Committee welcomes the general trend in Codex towards a more constructive relationship between non-governmental organisations, especially those representing consumers’ interests. It also welcomed the idea of a liaison point within Codex to act as a contact point with environmental and consumers organisations, and notes that IOCU are preparing a paper suggesting improvements in effective relationships with Codex.

    Report of the Twenty Sixth Session of the Codex Committee on Pesticide Residues, The Hague, Netherlands 11-18 April 1994 (Ref. Alinorm 95/24). Codex Alimentarius Commission, FAO/WHO, Rome.

     

    US pesticide reference
    This manual gives a quick reference to tank mixes and adjuvant recommendations for pest control products in the US. The data presented has been collected from labels and the companies.

    The User’s Reference Guide to Pesticides, WT Thomson, PO Box 9335, Fresno, CA, US, $27.95, 167pp.

      

    Help with hazards
    The Workers Health International Newsletter (WHIN) and the Hazards bulletin provide two excellent resources for those concerned with workplace and community hazards—WHIN reports internationally and Hazards mainly on the UK. Hazards is particularly oriented to the needs of workplace safety representatives. While both deal with broad hazard issues, there is regular coverage of pesticides, chemical exposure, biotechnology and chemical waste.
        As broad-based hazard journals, both give good coverage to related news, resources, studies, publications and conferences as well as alerting to changes in legislation or regulations which will affect workers or communities exposed to hazards. Explanations are clear, and practically oriented.
        Recent coverage in WHIN includes, for example: biotechnology hazards; US recognition of the chemical-related illness multiple chemical sensitivity (MCS); workplace epidemics; ILO report on chemical risk; the implications of free trade on workers rights. Recent articles in Hazards include increase in asthma in both workers and communities; impact of deregulation on health and safety; making complaints to the ombudsman on pesticide exposure.
        Hazards includes a regular guide to recent Health and Safety Executive Publications.

    Hazards, Information for Safety Reps and WHIN four issues per year, institutional annual subscription to each is £18 (Europe), £24 (outside Europe); for a joint subscription add £10. PO Box 199, Sheffield, S1 1FQ.

  • [This article first appeared in Pesticides News No. 25, September 1994, pages 22-23]