Round-up of pesticide regulation
in Asia
For more than a decade the International Organisation for Biological Control
(IOBC) Working Group on Pesticides and Beneficials has been measuring
the harmful effects of pesticides on natural enemies in Europe. Their
experience formed the basis of a recent training course on pesticide
effects (see Pesticides News 28) co-organised with the International
Institute of Biological Control (IIBC) for the Asia region. During the
course participants reported on the current situation of pesticide
regulation in their countries.
As part of its IPM programme,
IIBC is keen to encourage natural enemy testing in tropical crops
where excessive use of pesticides may wipe out beneficial insects and
lead to pest resurgence. The long-term aim is to bring testing on
natural enemies into pesticide registration procedures so participants
were invited from registration authorities and plant protection
agencies.
Registration—which involves submission of data on efficacy,
phytotoxicity, toxicity, environmental behaviour and other product
chemistry—is, of course, essential. But the ability to implement
legislation and regulate hazardous pesticides takes longer. The recent
survey by the UN FAO (see PN28), reported that although most
developing countries now have a registration scheme, health and
environmental problems have not been reduced.
China
Use and production
China is a major pesticide
user, as well as a producer, with an annual output of 220,000 tonnes
of active ingredients.
Registration features
All pesticides used must be
registered under the Regulations for Pesticide Registration, with data
submitted to the Registration Division and Bioassay Division of ICAMA.
Approximately 300 pesticide active ingredients are registered.
Any change in formulation, active ingredient concentration or scope of
application requires supplementary registration. Registration involves
three stages: field test, temporary registration and permanent
registration. Field tests should be carried out in at least two
different agricultural production sites for two years, and indicate
summary data on product chemistry, toxicity and efficacy. Pesticide
Field Trial Guidelines draw on the European Plant Protection
Organisation (EPPO)/FAO Asia and Pacific Region regulations taking
into account the specific conditions in China. Temporary registration
requires submission of detailed chemical data as well as registration
status in other countries, label and use restrictions. Permanent
registration is obtained only after completion of field trials for
efficacy and residues, and requires a complete set of toxicological
data.
Personnel and responsibilities
Most testing is carried out by
experts and technicians at research, technology or educational
institutes, and 250 qualified agricultural staff conduct pesticide
trials for the Bioassay Division.
Promotion of IPM and beneficial
insects
There is little testing of the
effects on beneficials, with the exception of certain pesticides, or
under specific conditions.
Indonesia
Registration features
All pesticides are prohibited,
unless they meet the registration requirements. The Ministry of
Agriculture is the registration body, assisted by the
inter-departmental Pesticides Committee. The Pesticide Control
Committee, established in 1985, oversees observance of the
regulations. The worst violations can carry a maximum of five years in
prison and US$125,000 fine.
Field and laboratory testing must be carried out by an accredited
institution approved by the Pesticides Committee, which also sets
protocols for efficacy testing. The Directorate of Food Crop
Protection or the National Atomic Agency Laboratory check
physical-chemical properties before efficacy field tests of certain
pesticides.
Registration is rejected for substances which are either chronically
(carcinogen, teratogen, mutagen, etc.) or acutely toxic, including WHO
Class Ia or Ib, although there is provision for a restricted permit
for essential use, and such pesticides cannot be sold directly to the
general public. To safeguard the environment, they must not be toxic
in water. It is intended to phase out persistent and bioaccumulative
pesticides, particularly organochlorines. Ozone depleting substances
will be phased out by 1997. There are 57 formulations banned for use
on rice to prevent insect resistance and resurgence. A further 22
active ingredients have been banned, and in 1995, about 146
formulations are being phased out. All registered pesticides are being
reviewed.
In the absence of national residues standards, the
FAO/WHO MRLs are
being adopted.
Korean Republic
The Rural Development
Administration (RDA), the central agricultural institution in the
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry (MAFF), is responsible
for all crop and livestock research and extension activities at a
national level.
Legislation and registration
All pesticides for plant
protection are regulated under the Pesticide Management law of 1957. A
further law, Poisonous and Deleterious Substances Management, promotes
rational use of pesticides and is enforced by the Ministry of Health
and Welfare.
The RDA is responsible for pesticide regulation and control.
Registration data are submitted to the National Agricultural Science
and Technical Institute through the Agrochemicals Industry
Association. Except for chronic toxicity and residues, data must be
generated in domestic conditions.
Any formulator can register an approved pesticide on production of the
manufacturer's technical certificate. Formulators are responsible for
their own quality control, although an inspection office collects
samples at irregular intervals and pesticides which do not meet
specifications should be recalled.
Extremely toxic pesticides are distributed through specific agencies
(e.g. forestry) and restricted for use within a limited area, e.g.
Aldicarb G is only allowed for use in forests and aluminium phosphide
only on stored grain. Most highly toxic pesticides are prohibited for
use in paddy rice.
Training
Educational programme and
material on safe use is distributed through the agricultural extension
offices. The media is employed during the farming season. The material
includes guidelines to aid selection of the most effective pesticides,
handling and safe use standards, recommendations for tank mixing, and
poison antidotes. There are training courses for pesticides dealers.
Concerns
Discarded pesticide bottles,
plastic bags and other containers are a serious concern, although a
container reclamation service exists. MAFF requests the formulators to
use polyethylene terephalate (PET) bottles which are combustible after
use.
Natural enemy screening and
improvements
There is no requirement to test
pesticides for their effects on non-target arthropods. However work is
underway to determine the impact of specific pesticides on natural
enemies, including evaluations of the toxicity of a rice pesticide on
two rice field spiders.
The RDA, in co-operation with UNDP and the FAO Inter-Country IPM
programme, has initiated a training programme to provide new
management skills to farmers and extension workers. The programme
includes information and education about pesticide impacts on health,
non-target organisms, and pest management. Crops covered include rice,
apples, greenhouse and field vegetables.
In 1995 the Ministry of Environment introduced a system of
environmental impact rating for herbicides for display on the label.
More regulations are expected to follow as environmental impact
reduction is a key policy of the government.
Laos
Chemical pesticide use in
agriculture is mostly confined to irrigated rice, but is increasing in
vegetable cultivation near larger provincial towns. The low level of
pesticide use reflects the low incomes—and therefore low purchasing
power of smallholder producers; their lack of availability throughout
most of the country; and active government discouragement of use.
Existing use is largely confined to insecticides. Fungicides and
herbicides are rarely used and not generally available through
commercial outlets. This low level of use is regarded as responsible
for the wide range and high population levels of natural insect pest
predators. Use of botanical pesticides is encouraged and small
quantities are produced locally.
Regulation
The Pesticides Act to control
the import, manufacture and/or repacking of pesticides is yet to be
implemented. Almost all chemical pesticides are imported. The
Department of Agriculture and Extension is the authority for approving
import. Pesticides are provided as ‘development aid’, with Japan
being a major supplier. In 1991-92 approximately 103 tons of
pesticides were imported, of which about 40 tons came from Japan.
Pesticides restricted or banned in many countries do find their way
onto markets. Some pesticides sold in markets of provincial towns,
notably methyl parathion, are from unknown sources. The relatively
open borders with Thailand, Vietnam and China mean that not all
pesticides sold are approved imports.
Registration
Laos does not have procedures
for pesticide registration. However in 1994 the Ministry of
Agriculture and Forestry approved a pesticide regulation to control
imports of pesticides known to be harmful to humans and animals,
pesticides capable of causing environmental pollution, and to prevent
the import of low quality pesticides and pesticides banned in other
countries.
IPM research
IPM on rice is supported by
International Rice Research Institute through a project which began in
1991. An IPM research and extension network was developed in the three
rice environments (wet lowland, irrigated and wet upland), to identify
and establish the significance of insect pests. In 1993, a survey of
191 farmers in wet lowland rice found that drought was seen as the
most important constraint on rice production, followed by pest damage
(insects, crabs/snails). Another survey of 138 farmers in central and
southern Laos found 28% used pesticides during the 1993 wet
season—most only one application. Few farmers knew the
beneficial arthropods naturally occurring in their rice fields,
although they were aware of insects and animals that do not feed on
rice. Most farmers believed pesticide applications would improve rice
yields, but could not afford them. This highlights the danger of
future increased pesticide use associated with any increase in farm
incomes and increased pesticide availability, particularly as most
farmers were unaware of potential health and environment hazards
associated with pesticide use.
The main obstacles to IPM in Laos are insufficient data on appropriate
IPM control strategies for the pests, (although research should fill
this void within two years) lack of a developed national extension
service which could provide the basis for the extension of IPM
technology to farmers and lack of farmer training in IPM concepts.
Limited cash incomes of farmers will limit the adoption of those IPM
technologies which require a financial outlay.
Myanmar (formerly Burma)
Use of pesticides
Pest infestation in Myanmar is
very low compared with countries in the region. Annual consumption of
pesticides is about 350-450 tonnes: about 432 tonnes were imported in
1993-94. All chemical pesticides are imported as finished products,
although one plant near Rangoon set up with assistance from the United
Nations Industrial Development Organisation formulates cypermethrin,
diazinon, endosulfan, fenitrothion and phenthoate. Approximately 77%
of pesticides (90% of insecticides) are used on rice, groundnuts,
cotton and vegetables. Fungicides are mostly used on oil seeds,
cereals, sugarcane, horticultural crops and legumes. Pesticides are
subsidised to farmers.
A factory in upper Myanmar processes neem seed extract, and has an
annual production capacity of approximately 25,000 litres. The
products are welcomed by farmers, particularly vegetable growers.
Regulatory procedures
The Pesticide Law was passed in
1990 and procedures were added in 1991. A registration system follows
standard procedures laid down by the FAO and WHO. The Pesticide
Registration Board was formed in 1992. Based in the Ministry of
Agriculture, the Myanmar Agriculture Services tests pesticides for
efficacy and directs pesticide importers to ensure the content
conforms with the label. Bio-efficacy and efficacy trials must
be carried out. All those wishing to import a registered pesticide
must obtain a permit, and dealers are licensed. Before the market
oriented economic reforms, pesticides were imported only by government
agencies. The Plant Protection Section of the agricultural service has
14 teams which work with extension staff in every state.
The most commonly used pesticides are diazinon, EPN,
phenthoate, fenitrothion, phosphamidon, monocrotophos, carbaryl,
deltamethrin,
cypermethrin and cartap hydrochloride. Others include aldrin,
malathion, padan (cartap hydrochloride), carbofuran.
Restrictions are in place on methyl bromide,
phosphine, bromidialone,
zinc phosphide, brodifacoum, fenthion and DDT, and aldrin will be
banned when existing stocks are exhausted.
Biological controls
There is an
abundance of natural enemies in farm
lands, and neem products are
used.
The Plant
Protection Section encourages IPM on selected crops—mainly pest surveillance
and scouting systems.
Pakistan
Import and Consumption
Despite annual pesticide use of
billions of rupees, one estimate suggests that only 30% of crops are
sprayed. Consumption of pesticides increased from 3,677 million tonnes
in 1981 to 20,279 million tonnes in 1993, coinciding with transfer of
trade to the private sector.
All pesticides are imported as either technical grade or ready
formulated products. Insecticides have the major market share.
Organophosphates account for about 60% of total use. Over 70% of
pesticides are used for cotton and the rest mainly on rice, sugarcane,
fruit and vegetables. At present about 400 products comprising over
200 active ingredients are registered. Pesticide dealers are required
to be registered and trained in safe use of pesticides.
Pesticides Registration
Import, manufacture,
formulation, distribution, safe use and advertisement of pesticides
are regulated under the Agricultural Pesticides Ordinance, 1971 and
Agricultural Pesticides Rules, 1973, which are based on the 1982 FAO
guidelines. Applications for registration must be submitted to the
Department of Plant Protection, Ministry of Food and Agriculture.
Samples are tested by agricultural research institutions in each
ecological zone.
Government institutions test for efficacy over two seasons. The
test protocols used for bio-efficacy are consistent with those
recommended at a regional workshop on harmonisation held in Malaysia
in 1988. However, commodity products which have been registered in
their country of manufacture are considered for registration under a
generic scheme, and are not required to undergo two season trials.
There is no evaluation of pesticides effect on natural enemies.
Bans
Pakistan has banned the import
of 21 pesticides, and more are under consideration.
Thailand
Pesticides are regulated by the
Hazardous Substances Act of 1992—an improvement in the pesticide
control system. However the ministerial rules and notifications are
still being drafted. Phased registration as recommended by FAO was
introduced in 1991. This involves three steps. Before the product is
marketed, full registration is required which includes test results of
bioefficacy and complete toxicological data with two-years feeding
studies.
Registration features
Registration was first
established in 1973, but since adopting the FAO Code and the new
registration scheme, improvements have included: control of all
pesticides and plant growth regulators; standard FAO data
requirements; WHO recommended pesticide classification by hazard was
adopted; the colour band and pictograms on labels; better analytical
specifications to ensure quality control. Nevertheless, standards need
to be further raised to meet international requirements.
Philippines
Registration
The government Food Production
Programme based on high input agriculture prompted the creation of the
Fertilizer and Pesticide Authority (FPA) in 1977. The FPA is the
designated national authority for registration matters, and for the
PIC procedure.
FPA licences pesticide distributors and dealers and issues a
certificate authorising import. Registration may be suspended or
cancelled when there is imminent danger of use or misuse of the
products or violations of regulations by handlers.
Education, training and certification of pesticide handlers and
agro-medical officers are also significant activities of the FPA. The
Pesticide Management Council is developing training for
agriculturalists to help the FPA’s Certification Programme.
Registration of some new and toxic pesticides will be evaluated for
risk/benefits by consultants.
Field monitoring and implementation of FPA rules and regulations are
carried out by regional and provincial officers.
Developments
Crop protection in the
Philippines is changing significantly, with heightened concern on
public health and the environment, now reflected in policy and
actions. The registration now requires more scientific data on new
pesticides. Recent upgrading of the Pesticidal Analytical Laboratories
means better monitoring of pesticide tolerances, established in
line with the CODEX Alimentarius.
Bans and restrictions
No new registrations of
pesticides in WHO class I are allowed, and those previously registered
are being reviewed. Recently the authority banned methyl parathion and
azinphos-ethyl.
Pesticides which endanger the aquatic ecosystem and rice production
are causing concern. Organotin compounds and endosulfan formulations
have been severely restricted from use in lowland rice or near bodies
of water. Monocrotophos is restricted for use on bean fly control
only.
Certain pesticides may be sold only by certified agrochemical advisers
employed by agricultural input distributors and dealers.
Alternatives
Bioefficacy testing of
pesticides includes effects on beneficial organisms.
Vietnam
Pesticides use
Pesticides have been widely
used in Vietnam for 30 years. About 127 pesticide active ingredients
are used, including 54 insecticides, 36 fungicides, 32 herbicides, two
rodenticides and three plant growth regulators. In 1994 319 pesticide
products were permitted for use. Of these 174 were insecticides and 56
herbicides.
Between 1990-93, the quantity of pesticides imported dropped and the
use of some pesticides has been restricted. In 1991, 12,800 tons were
imported (value US$22.5 million) which declined to about 10,000 tons
(value US$15 million) in 1993. By weight, insecticides represent 54%
of the market, fungicides 31% and herbicides 7%.
Farmers have begun to see the side-effects of pesticides, including
resistance in diamond back moth and brown plant hopper (BPH). In
1978-79, large scale BPH outbreaks occurred on about one million
ha of rice, with major crop losses. Normally 2-3 chemical treatments
are applied in a season.
Registration
In July 1991, the Vietnamese
government set up a pesticide registration committee.
Research into beneficial organisms
Research on beneficial
organisms has been carried out since 1975, concentrating on rice and
other main crops, although many beneficials have not yet been
investigated. Surveys have recorded 2,962 species of insects and 728
diseases on crops, and surveys of natural enemies identified 209
species on rice, 93 species in cotton and 89 in soy bean. These
include 117 parasitoids, 87 predators and 5 diseases.
Natural enemies are used in two main ways, by mass rearing and
releasing some species into the relevant crop and by protecting and
maintaining natural enemies in the crop.
Natural enemies were first used in Vietnam agriculture in 1980 to
control rice pests. Trichogramma spp. are effective against rice leaf
folder and yellow stem borer. Certain useful insects and fungi have
been identified which parasitise brown plant hopper and jute semi
looper. Bacillus thuringiensis is successfully used for control
of diamond back moth and rice leaf folder; Nuclear Polyhedrosis
Virus controls cotton bollworm and jute semi looper; and Trichoderma
controls sheaf blight in maize.