Food security means a sustainable environment and sustainable jobs-poor record of prawn farming

A key element in food security is creating employment, particularly in rural areas. But social and environmental considerations must form a key part of investments, or the longer term impacts can leave rural communities worse off, and while supplying food to global markets deprive local communities of food.
    A growing number of investments in developing countries in intensive shrimp farming are justified on the grounds of promoting jobs, but prompted by the severe crisis in the global fisheries brought about over-exploitation of the world's oceans.
    One Rs.3 billion (US$83 million) semi-intensive aquaculture project on the coastal areas of Andhra Pradesh in India, funded partly by the World Bank, was intended to generate two million jobs to rural people(1). To maintain dense stocking rates, artificial feed, chemical additives and antibiotics are used. Pesticides are used intensively, including many hazardous active ingredients such as malathion, parathion, methamidophos, paraquat and endosulfan.
    Intensive shrimp farming frequently has many negative impacts on delicate ecosystems, and on the long-term livelihood of the local population. A recent Christian Aid report(2), for example, draws attention to deforestation, salination of ground water, displacement of local people and pollution among other consequences.

1. Myths about aquaculture, Vikas Adhyayan Kendra, November 1995, Information Bulletin.
2. Kevan Bundell and Eileen Maybin, After the Prawn Rush, The human and environmental costs of commercial prawn farming, Christian Aid, London, May 1996.

[This article first appeared in Pesticides News No. 33 as part of the Focus on Food supplement, September 1996, page 21]