Book reviews - Pesticides News No. 33

Agent Orange update
This US National Academy of Sciences (NAS) book updates and evaluates the available scientific evidence of statistical associations between diseases and exposure to herbicides, (especially 2,4,5-T and its contaminant dioxin [TCDD]), by US service personnel during the Vietnam War. Between 1962 and 1971 US military forces sprayed nearly 19 million gallons (5.2 million litres) of herbicides over 3.6 million acres of Vietnam.
    The book focuses on new scientific studies published since 1994 (when a previous NAS report Veterans and Agent Orange was produced [see PN24 p22]). The 1996 NAS committee has re-assessed a number of possible adverse health effects suffered by veterans and their offspring in terms of four health risk categories: sufficient evidence; limited/suggestive; inadequate/insufficient evidence of an association; and limited/suggestive evidence of no association.
    The 1996 committee found sufficient evidence of an association with herbicides and/or TCDD for four diseases: soft-tissue sarcoma; non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma; Hodgkin’s disease; and chloracne. This is one less than the number of diseases so classified in 1994. Porphyria cutanea tarda has been reclassified into the category ‘limited/suggestive evidence’. In addition, there are two other diseases that have been placed in the ‘limited/suggestive evidence’ category: spina bifida and acute and sub-acute (transient) peripheral neuropathy. Respiratory cancers (lung, larynx and trachea), prostate cancer and multiple myeloma also maintain their status in this category.
    The 1996 committee concludes that most of the numerous health studies on Vietnam veterans have been hampered by relatively poor knowledge of exposure to herbicides or TCDD, in addition to other methodological problems. The committee found there was  sufficient evidence for reaching the conclusions about statistical associations between herbicide exposure and health outcomes. The lack of adequate data on Vietnam veterans per se complicates the assessment of increased risk of disease among any one individual.

Veterans and Agent Orange: update 1996, National Academy Press, 2101 Constitution Ave, NW, Washington, DC 20418, US, 1996, 823pp. Order direct from Amazon.co.uk.

 

Effects of spraying on non-target species
This Danish report provides a comparison between soil-related Hymenopteran parasitoids (which attack many agricultural pests by laying eggs within the pest, which develop and then consume the pest) from non-sprayed and sprayed areas. Peter Bonde Jensen from the University of Aahus concludes that the non-sprayed areas support more species and higher densities of most soil-related Hymenopteran parasitoids.
Peter Bonde Jensen, The Influence of Non-spraying on Parasitoids, Pesticides Research No. 19, Ministry of Environment and Energy, Denmark, Miliøbutikken, Tel. +45 33379292, Fax +45 33927690 90 DKK, 1996, 81pp.

 

Taxing toxics
A ‘mill’ tax is a sales tax at the rate of hundredths of a cent per dollar used in California to raise revenue. This report looks at how such a tax could be used to reduce pesticide use—a sales tax calculated on the weight of active ingredient is one way. A risk-based tax on the differential risks posed by different chemicals might be another, more complicated way. A targeted tax based on point-of-use at particular sites would be a third and even more administratively complicated way.
    The benefits of such an approach would be to fund regulatory activity, to fund IPM research. It could also provide the incentive to reduce use by increasing pesticide cost and stimulating other non-chemical forms of pest control.
    The options are clearly set out and have generally been recognised for some time. The report does assume a small and fairly constant price elasticity of pesticides over a wide range of price increases. It also assumes that the pesticide element in the production costs is small—which it seems to be in California unlike other sectors or other countries. The report does not consider some of the impacts of changing crop production patterns in response to changing pesticide use.
    California, the world’s fifth largest agricultural economy, is always striving to reduce the impact of pesticides on health and environment. Let us hope that this work is successful in promoting a ‘mill’ tax on pesticides in order to stimulate the development of IPM initiatives.
William S. Pease, James C. Robinson and Daniel Tuden, Taxing Pesticides To Fund Environmental Protection and Integrated Pest Management, An Environmental Health Policy Program Report, Centre for Occupational and Environmental Health, University of California, Berkeley CA, 1996, 36pp.

 

Green farming
“UK agriculture continues to have serious and unacceptable environmental impacts. At the heart of this complex problem is our attitude to food and, in particular, whether the prices we pay reflect the full environmental costs of production,” said the television journalist Jonathan Dimbleby launching Growing Greener, the new report on the environmental sustainability of UK agriculture.
    The report looks at the impact of agriculture on air, water, soil, biodiversity, landscape, energy, farming and the rural community, and food. In particular it calls for new policies for the control of pests, including developing and promoting lower input and integrated crop management techniques, and better technical and financial support for lower input systems including organic farming.

David Baldock (IEEP), Kevin Bishop (University of Cardiff), Karen Mitchell (IEEP) and Adrian Phillips (University of Cardiff), Growing Greener. Sustainable Agriculture in the UK, written for the Council for the Protection of Rural England/World Wide Fund for Nature, 1996, 143pp.  Order direct from Amazon.co.uk.

 

New WHO guidelines for pesticides in water
The first volume of this pair presented summary evidence in support of Guideline Values to a number of contaminants in water. Most of the 36 pesticides evaluated are herbicides, which are in general more water soluble. Those listed include aldicarb, atrazine, bentazone, carbofuran, 2,4-D, isoproturon, lindane, MCPA, pendimethalin, permethrin, simazine and trifluralin.
    Guideline Values are based on toxicological criteria and are said to represent ‘safe’ concentrations for an individual to consume every day for a lifetime. Although the information presented is useful, there are limitations to the guideline approach. The data is presented for only a few of the 1,000 active ingredients. The values do not take account of ecotoxic effects which can occur at levels considerably below the guideline values. Nor do they consider mixtures of pesticides or breakdown products.
    In compiling the data, WHO acknowledges sight of data from manufacturers which is not in the public domain. Disclosure of data relating to the effects of pesticides on human health is essential: there should be no reason why this cannot be placed in the public domain.

Guidelines for Drinking Water Quality, Volume 2: Health Criteria and Other Supporting Information. Second Edition, World Health Organisation, Geneva, 1996, 973 pp. Order direct from Amazon.co.uk.

 

Order direct from Amazon.co.uk

GMO overview
This book, written by US academics, provides a global summary of environmental applications of genetically engineered organisms. It categorises and describes the environmental releases and their effects.
    Public attitudes towards biotechnology are assessed and suggested to be complex and to contain many contradictions. One poll cited revealed that only 19% of the respondents had knowledge of the potential risk posed by products of biotechnology. 

Morris Levin and Eitan Israeli (Eds.), Engineered organisms in environmental settings: Biotechnological and agricultural applications, Times Mirror International Publishers Ltd., Unit 1, Sheldon Way, Aylesford, Kent, ME20 6SF, Tel. +44 (0)171 391 6464, Fax +44 (0)171 391 6598, 1996, 201pp.  Order direct from Amazon.co.uk.

 

Order direct from Amazon.co.uk

Genetic engineering risks
The authors from the US Union of Concerned Scientists identify the environmental risks of commercial uses of transgenic crops. These include the potential of transgenic crops to become weeds or to produce weeds with transgenic properties such as herbicide resistance, that may require costly control programmes. 
    Looking at the global seed trade, the authors discuss the relationship between commercial approval and environmental risks in the US and overseas. Of particular concern is the flow of novel genes into the centres of crop biodiversity, primarily in the developing world, that could threaten the genetic base of the world's future food supply.

Jane Rissler and Margaret Mellon, The Ecological Risks of Engineered Crops, MIT Press, Fitzroy House, 11 Chenies Street, London WC1E 7ET, June 1996, 168pp. Order direct from Amazon.co.uk.

 

NAFTA pesticide market
Crop Protection in NAFTA provides market data on the pesticide business in the US, Canada and Mexico. By far the largest market is the US, with 87% of NAFTA sales, although 'growth potential' is limited. For this reason, Mexico is seen as an attractive alternative as many companies are looking for productive new markets. Despite this, the Mexican agrochemical sales decreased by 20% in 1995, from US$445  million in 1994, to US$335 million. In the US sales for 1995 were US$7,869 million, up 7.2% from 1994. Over the same period the Canadian market expanded by 10%  to US$846 million.
Katie Shaw, Crop Protection in NAFTA, Agrow, 18/20 Hill Rise, Richmond, Surrey, TW10 6UA, UK, Tel., +44 (0)181 948 3262, Fax +44 (0)181 948 6866.

 

Great Lakes study cut-back
A recent study by the International Joint Commission (of the US and Canada) has revealed that funding for Great Lakes science programmes peaked in 1994 and has declined significantly since then. A survey of 31 major Great Lakes research organisations show that between 1994 and 1997 they expect reductions in funding of 26 to 50% (from US $88.9 million to US$44.2-56.7 million). Fish stocks in the Great Lakes provide US$2-4 billion annually to the region, which should alone provide ample evidence of the need to continue vital Great Lakes research. Some work which may be affected includes ecotoxicology, contaminants in fish, and air emissions.
Eighth biennial report of Great Lakes Water Quality, Great Lakes Regional Office, 100 Ouellettee Ave, eighth floor, Windsor, ON N9A 6T3, 1996, 48pp, +1 519 257 6734, Fax +1 519 257 6740.

 

Application of biologicals
This new report by Micron Sprayers offers workers in the field a referenced summary of what has been achieved so far. Categorised in four sections—CDA spraying of Bacillus thuringiensis, entomopathogenic (insect-killing) fungi, viruses and mycoherbicides—the review covers the whole spectrum of agriculture, horticulture and forestry.
A review of work carried out relevant to the use of CDA for application biological products, PN readers can receive a free copy of the review from: Duncan Rhind, Micron Sprayers, Three Mills, Bromyard, Herts, HR7 4HU, UK, Tel., +44 (0)1885 482397, Fax +44 (0)1885 483043.

 

Ecological pest control
In Ecologically Based Pest Management a North American  academic committee advocates the adoption of this research, known as EBPM, as a means of promoting both agricultural productivity and a balanced ecosystem. The committee stresses the need for information, identifies research priorities in the biological as well as the  socioeconomic realm, and suggests institutional structures for a multi-disciplined research effort.
Ecologically Based Pest Management, National Research Council, National Academy Press, 12 Hid's Copse Road, Oxford, OX2 9JJ, UK, Tel. (0)1865 865 466, Fax (0)1865 862 763, June 1996, 144pp.

 

Comparative poisoning in the European Union
This report is the result of an effort by the European Commission to collate and compare data from poison centres or national competent authorities in the European Union for the calendar year 1993.
    The report pulls together details about national poisons centres and the calls on their services, together with details of the victims and the agents causing their illness. Nearly every country employs a different way of recording and reporting incidents—including incidents involving pesticides—and the main conclusion of the report is to aim at standardisation so that figures can be compared and variables isolated. The frequency of pesticides as a poisoning agent varies widely between countries and between years. In 1993 it varied from about 3% in UK to about 20% in Denmark. If poisonings that result from pharmaceuticals are excluded, about 11% of poisonings in the EU in 1993 resulted from pesticides.
Poison Centres: Collection of the annual reports 1993: Analysis and synthesis, Produced for the European Commission (DGV-Employment, Industrial Relations and Social Affairs, Health and Safety), (Agreement no. SOC 94 201554 05F01) by Europlus S.A., Brussels, August 1995, 160pp.

 

Home chemicals guide
Pesticides figure prominently in this consumers guide to the chemicals found in the Australian home environment. It is produced by the Total Environment Centre and the Australian Consumers’ Association. Many of the products include pesticides that are used internationally. The book provides brief information on how these products work and their effects on health and the environment Wherever possible, less hazardous alternatives are suggested.
    The degree of health and ecological risk is rated according to five categories ranging from ‘do not use at all’ to a ‘very low risk’ least hazardous option. The insecticide group of natural pyrethrins (extracted from tropical chrysanthemums) is one of the few groups of pesticides in the lowest risk category. Many of the organochlorines are in the ‘do not use at all’ status. This seems facile as many of them are banned for use anyway. The herbicide paraquat is a notable exception. It is given the worst category status whilst still being widely available on the Australian market.
A-Z of chemicals in the home, Choice books, Total Environment Centre, Shop 1, Gloucester Walk, 88 Cumberland Street, Sydney, NSW, 2000, Australia, Fax, +61 2 247 7118, 1996, 160pp.

[This article first appeared in Pesticides News No. 33, September 1996, pages 30-31]