Increase in ill health incidents

The Health and Safety Executive (HSE) has published the details of 188 pesticide incidents reported to its Pesticides Incidents Appraisal Panel (PIAP) between 1 April 1997 and 31 March 1998.  Of these incidents, 97 involved alleged ill health and PIAP considered a probable relationship between the incident and the ill health in a quarter of these. The number of alleged ill health incidents has increased from 81 last year. 
    During the year 1997/98, the courts heard eight cases of alleged pesticide misuse, compared to 11 the previous year. The average fine per conviction has risen over the period from £583 to £1,175. HSE inspectors issued 212 enforcement notices under the Food and Environment Protection Act 1985 or Control of Pesticides Regulations 1986 compared to 185 in 1996/97.
    The Incident Report highlights a number of pesticide case studies. A case involving sulphuric acid used on potatoes illustrates that failure to use any pesticide correctly can be costly. A major contractor (name withheld by HSE) applied sulphuric acid to desiccate (dry off) potato haulms before harvesting. The company oversprayed a public footpath, failed to meet the requirement to display statutory warning notices, and failed to keep unprotected people out of the treated area for at least 96 hours after spraying as set out in the specific conditions of approval. HSE prosecuted the contractor who was fined £3,500 plus £2,169 costs.
    In another case, the HSE prosecuted a farmer for discarding unwashed pesticide containers in the corner of an arable field near a road and close to houses. His action posed a particular threat to inquisitive children. He was found guilty and given a conditional discharge but ordered to pay costs of £745.
    Spray drift continues to be a major cause of complaint. In one incident a member of the public complained that a spray contractor had applied pesticide to cereals in a field next to his property when the wind speed was high, resulting in excessive spray drift. He had not notified the complainant before spraying. No proceedings were taken.
    Commenting on the incidents, Enfys Chapman of the Pesticides Exposure Group of Sufferers (PEGS) is concerned that many pesticide incidents go un-investigated. She said: "If the HSE officials gathered the information more quickly, they would produce more significant results."
    A recent case illustrates Ms Chapman's point. "In a pesticide exposure incident in Wisbech, Cambridgeshire, six people were made ill and two dogs died. The GP (doctor) didn't see them for a fortnight and the HSE in Norwich refused to see them. Two weeks after the incident, the victims contacted PEGS, but by then it was too late to investigate properly," lamented Ms Chapman.

Pesticide Incident Reports 1997/98, Field Operations Directorate Investigations 1 April 1997 - 31 March 1998, Health and Safety Executive, 1998, 22pp.

[This article first appeared in Pesticides News No. 42, December 1998, page 15]