PAN International Website

OP litigation suffers setback

An attempt by 25 farmers and workers to sue agrochemical companies or employers for the ill-health they now suffer as a result of exposure to organophosphate sheep dips has almost completely collapsed. But one firm of solicitors has announced that they intend to fight on.
    The legal action, initially involving over 60 separate cases, and hundreds more applications, were consolidated into a group-case in 1999. If compensation was successfully won, the case would be a land-mark for other victims of OP exposure.
    Earlier this year, the leading firm of solicitors Hodge, Jones & Allen pulled out, saying that ‘We have not been able to find the evidence to prove the link between [the litigants’] symptoms and organophosphates in sheep dips … we are not able to justify the further expenditure of public funds by the Legal Services Commission (formerly the Legal Aid Board) on this group action.’
    Mrs Elisabeth Charles, of Gabb & Co, in Hay-on-Wye, says: ‘There is no doubt the sheep dippers and others affected by organophosphates that I have seen deserve compensation. I feel considerable concern about the rationale provided by the generic solicitors for advising that the claims could not succeed.’
    Gabb & Co have lodged an appeal with the Legal Services Commission, and lawyers will argue that genuine claimants are being denied access to the courts. This could be a contravention of the newly implemented Human Rights Act 1998.

[This article first appeared in Pesticides News No.50, December 2000, p18]


Subscriptions
Publications
Email the Editor