|
| |
Canada Supreme Court allows ban on lawn pesticides
In June 2001 the Canadian supreme court upheld the decision of the Hudson
local authority in Montreal to ban the use of residential lawn care pesticides
under local bylaw legislation.
Two Quebec lawn care companies opposed the ban on the grounds
that it was wrong for Hudson to block the use of chemicals that had been
approved by the federal and provincial authorities(1).
The court came to a unanimous decision to uphold the ban
stating 'our common future, that of every Canadian community, depends on a
healthy environment'. The court further added that 'based on the distinction
between essential and non-essential uses of pesticides, it is reasonable to
conclude that the town bylaw's purpose is to minimize the use of allegedly
harmful pesticides in order to promote the health of its inhabitants'.
Hudson is among 36 other Quebec towns who, along with
Halifax, Nova Scotia, enacted similar bans for non-essential pesticide use from
1991 onwards.
The restriction of non-essential use pesticide products for
purposes such as lawn care treatments is being taken up by many other countries
including parts of the US and Europe. The National Chemicals Inspectorate in
Sweden is proposing to limit the use of chemical herbicides in homes and
gardens. The Inspectorate is concerned about the lack of knowledge surrounding
water contamination from the increased use of domestic herbicides. Products
under scrutiny include those containing glyphosate - the use of which has
increased from a few hundred kilos at the end of the 1980s to more than 10
tonnes in 1999. The proposal is considered to be a contribution towards
achieving one of the goals set by the Committee on Environmental Objectives,
being 'A non-toxic environment'(2).
With regard to inert ingredients the Canadian Health
Minister, Allan Rock, has called for the disclosure of all toxic and
allergy-related ingredients used in pesticide products. The Canadian Crop
Protection Institute (CPI) does not believe that the listing of inert
ingredients on product labels is in the best interests of consumers. The CPI
want the label to display usage instructions with a full list of ingredients
available on a separate data sheet available on request(3).
1. Angela Rickman, Sierra Club of Canada (www.sierraclub.ca/national);
Reuters,Canada Supreme Court Allows Ban on Lawn Pesticides, June 28, 2001;
Globe and Mail The tools to keep pesticides in check, June 29, 2001.
2. Training required for using herbicides in home gardens, KEMI press release,
www.kemi.se/aktuellt/pressmedd/2000/200622_eng.htm
3. Inert ingredients disclosure in Canada, Agrow, No 380, July 13th, 2001,
p17.
[This article first appeared in
Pesticides News No. 53, September 2001, page 19] |