|
| |
Chemical crustaceans: pesticides and prawn farming
Prawn or shrimp farming is a massive industry located largely on the
coasts of developing countries. As the demand for farmed shrimp has increased,
the industry has proliferated and use of chemicals has intensified. Mike
Shanahan and Steve Trent of the Environmental Justice Foundation
report.
Most consumers think of shrimp* as coming from the sea –
they are harvested by trawlers, brought to shore and then packed for
distribution to restaurants, supermarkets, and other retailers. But these days,
nearly one-third of shrimp eaten in industrialised nations comes from farms. The
US$7 billion shrimp farming industry has experienced massive growth since its
advent in the 1970s, and shrimp are now farmed in over 50 countries(1).
A variety of systems are used, varying in the degree of
intensification employed, with the most intensive farms being found in Asia. The
unnaturally-high stocking densities used means that a suite of inputs is needed
to maintain productivity. One study of shrimp farmers from three different
regions of Thailand found that on average they used 13 different products(2).
Chemicals used in intensive shrimp farming include
fertilizers, disinfectants, coagulants, liming materials, feed additives (e.g.
steroid hormones, probiotics, feed attractants, vitamins, and immunostimulants),
and antibiotics (e.g. sulfonamides, tetracyclines, quinolones, nitrofurans, and
chloramphenicol – the latter two banned in the US and EU)(3).
Additionally, a number of pesticides are used to kill fish
and molluscs before stocking the ponds, whilst others are added to pond water to
control bacterial and fungal infections and parasitic worms(4,5). These
pesticides, many of which are of concern due to threats they pose to health or
the environment, hail from a range of chemical classes (see table).
Pesticides used in shrimp farming
Organochlorines: endosulfan (II)
Organophospates: azinphos ethyl (Ib), chlorpyrifos (II), diazinon
(II), dichlorvos (Ib), malathion (III), monocrotophos (Ib), parathion (Ia),
trichlorfon (II)
Carbamates: carbaryl (II)
Other: paraquat (II), rotenone (II), nicotine (Ib), copper sulphate
(II), formalin (FM), trifluralin (U), butachlor (U)
World Health Organisation classification: Ia = extremely hazardous to
human health, Ib = highly hazardous, II = moderately hazardous, III =
slightly hazardous, U = unlikely to present acute hazard in normal use, FM
= fumigant (not classified in same way as other pesticides). |
 |
Health threats
The risks to human health from pesticide exposure have
been well-documented(6,7). For example, many organophosphates and carbamates are
toxic to the nervous system through cholinesterase inhibition. Poisoning may
occur through the skin as well as orally and by inhalation.
Acute symptoms of exposure to these chemicals range from
headache, nausea, dizziness, and anxiety through blurred vision and vomiting, to
seizures and death (usually from respiratory failure). Chronic exposure can have
similar effects. In addition, pesticide exposure has been linked to a range of
serious respiratory diseases, cancers, birth defects and reproductive and
neurological disorders.
Of the pesticides used in shrimp farming, a number are of
special concern. Prolonged or repeated contact with trifluralin may cause
allergic dermatitis, whilst carbaryl is an irritant and direct contact may cause
burns(8). Dichlorvos is classified as a possible human carcinogen(9). In powder
form, rotenone is toxic by inhalation and may cause respiratory paralysis(10).
Formalin is severely irritating to the eyes, skin and respiratory tract;
repeated or prolonged contact may cause skin sensitisation, prolonged inhalation
may cause asthma-like symptoms, and it may also be carcinogenic to humans(11).
Those handling chemicals on shrimp farms in developing
countries are generally poor, vulnerable and often lacking education. Inadequate
labelling often contributes to a general lack of information about safe and
effective use of chemicals in shrimp farming, which can lead to unsafe handling
practices such as mixing chemicals with bare hands, overdosing, and not
observing withdrawal periods before harvest(12,13). There exists, as a
consequence, a real and widespread risk of harm to human health.
Environmental impacts
The effects of these chemicals on the wider environment are largely unknown
because their use in shrimp farming is poorly-regulated and monitored. Many of
the pesticides (e.g endosulfan, dichlorvos, copper sulphate) used in shrimp
farming are very highly toxic to fish and other aquatic organisms.
This is of grave concern given the widespread discharge of
untreated shrimp farm effluent into surrounding waters. Intensive shrimp farms
require considerable water exchange and organophosphate bath treatments result
in the release into the surrounding waters of significant quantities of toxic
material liable to affect fish, molluscs and crustaceans, particularly larval
stages.
Further effects on non-target organisms may occur as a
consequence of the tendency of some of these pesticides (e.g. endosulfan,
azinphos-ethyl, trifluralin) to bioaccumulate in fish and marine invertebrates,
thus posing threats to organisms higher up the food chain.
Farmed shrimp – the human cost
Shrimp are farmed largely in developing countries but
exported for consumption in the industrialised West. Previously a
luxury, prices have fallen in recent years but the true cost is much
higher and is often transferred to some of the poorest and most
vulnerable communities in producer countries. In many cases, the advent
of shrimp farming has had serious consequences for such communities.
Shrimp farms have polluted agricultural land and water supplies with
chemicals and salt. In Indonesia, illnesses have resulted(14) and people
have resorted to drinking rainwater. Skin rashes from polluted water are
a common problem in such communities. ‘You see this water everywhere,
we cannot drink it – we cannot even touch it, because it’s given us
skin diseases from the salt and the chemicals in it. The wells are
poisoned. If we want drinking water, we have to go to another village to
get it’ said Sitalakshmi, whose village in India is surrounded by
shrimp farms(15).
Toxic effluent from shrimp farms threatens the wild
species, further impacting local communities dependent upon them for
food. For example, shrimp farming has been linked to fish deaths and
deformities in the Philippines(16) and mass deaths of crabs in Brazil,
where one traditional crab collector said ‘How sad it is to wake up
and not to have enough food for the children and grandchildren’(17).
Shrimp farms have physically blocked access to
traditionally-used coastal resources and, as mangrove forests have been
cleared to create shrimp ponds, catches of fish and shell-fish have
declined. In some places, land has been seized by force. People have
died in at least 11 countries through conflict directly related to
shrimp farming, with over 150 deaths in Bangladesh alone(18). |
Concluding remarks
Mention pesticide problems and most readers of this
journal think of farmers in developing countries being exposed to toxic
chemicals as they spray fields. The poorly regulated use of chemicals in shrimp
farming world-wide is a little-known hazard that deserves urgent attention.
Research is needed to elucidate the extent of impacts on
those handling chemicals, and to the wider environment, especially aquatic
ecosystems. The shrimp farming industry must be subjected to scrutiny regarding
the types of chemical inputs used and the manner in which they are employed. A
precautionary approach should be adopted and the most dangerous (WHO Class Ia
and Ib) chemicals should be prohibited immediately. Finally, potential risks to
consumers should be considered and responsible authorities should ensure that
shrimp are thoroughly screened for dangerous pesticide residues.
* Many people use the words ‘shrimp’ and ‘prawn’
interchangeably, EJF makes no distinction between the two.
New campaign
The Environmental Justice Foundation has recently
launched a campaign highlighting the serious environmental and social
impacts of shrimp production world-wide. EJF has spent 18 months
researching these issues in depth and will shortly be publishing their
findings in a series of authoritative reports. Currently, consumers have
no guarantee that the shrimp they buy have not been produced in an
ecologically devastating or socially unacceptable manner. EJF is raising
consumer awareness whilst seeking practical solutions to the problems of
shrimp production.
More information can be found at www.ejfoundation.org/shrimp. |
References
1. EJF, Environmental Impacts of Shrimp Farming, 2003, Environmental Justice
Foundation, London, UK [in press].
2. World Bank, Network of Aquaculture Centres in Asia-Pacific, Worldwide Fund
for Nature, and FAO, Shrimp Farming and the Environment, A Consortium Program
to Analyse and Share Experiences on the Better Management of Shrimp
Aquaculture in Coastal Areas, Synthesis Report, Work In Progress for Public
Discussion, published 2002, www.enaca.org
3. Gräslund, S. et al, A field survey of chemicals and biological products
used in shrimp farming, Marine Pollution Bulletin 46: 81-90, 2003.
4. Gräsland, S. and Bengtsson, B.-E. Chemicals and biological products used
in south-east Asian shrimp farming and their potential impact on the
environment – a review, Science of the Total Environment 280: 93-131, 2003.
5. Tonguthai, K., The use of chemicals in aquaculture in Thailand, in Arthur,
J.R., Lavilla-Pitogo, C.R. and Subasinghe, R.P. (eds.) Use of chemicals in
aquaculture in Asia, Southeast Asian Fisheries Development Centre (SEAFDEC),
Aquaculture Department, Iloilo, Philippine, 2000.
6. EJF, 2003, What’s Your Poison? Health Threats Posed By Pesticides In
Developing Countries. EJF, London, UK, 2003.
7. Dinham, B. & Jacobs, M. (eds) Silent Invaders: Pesticides, Livelihoods
and Women’s Health,. Zed Books, London in association with Pesticide Action
Network UK, 2002.
8. EXTOXNET Pesticide Information Profile http://ace.orst.edu/info/extoxnet/]
9. International Agency for Research on Cancer, Dichlorvos, IARC Monographs on
the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans. 53: 267-308, 1991.
10. Group of Experts on the Scientific Aspects of Marine Pollution, Towards
Safe and Effective Use of Chemicals in Coastal Aquaculture. Reports and
Studies. No 65, 1997, GESAMP, FAO, Rome.
11. International Program on Chemical Safety, International Chemical Safety
Card, 1997 http://www.inchem.org/pages/icsc.html
12. Yulin, J., The use of chemicals in aquaculture in the People’s Republic
of China, in Arthur, J.R., Lavilla-Pitogo, C.R. and Subasinghe, R.P. (eds.)
Use of chemicals in aquaculture in Asia, SEAFDEC, Aquaculture Department,
Iloilo, Philippine, 2000.
13. Gräslund et al, 2003, Op. cit. 4.
14. Siregar, Raja P., Indonesia: mounting tensions over industrial shrimp
farmin, World Rainforest Movement Bulletin 51: October 2001 www.wrm.org.uy/bulletin/51/Indonesia.html
15. F. Ahmed, In Defence of Land and Livelihood. CUSO, Inter Pares, Sierra
Club of Canada, Consumer’s Association of Penang, Malaysia, 1997.
16. Philippine Resource Centre, The Philippine Aquaculture Industry, London,
UK, 2000.
www.prc.dircon.co.uk/philippine_aquaculture_industry.htm
17. Vanini, S, O Jaguaribe e a Criacao de Camarao no Ceará, Instituto
Terramar, Brazil, 2002.
18. EJF, Smash & Grab: Conflict, Corruption and Human Rights Abuses in the
Shrimp Farming Industry, 2003, Environmental Justice Foundation, London, UK,
2003.
Contact: Mike Shanahan (Project Coordinator) or Steve Trent
(Director), Environmental Justice Foundation, 5 St Peter’s Street, London N1
8JD, UK. Tel: +44 (0)207 359 0440, Fax: +44 (0)207 359 7123, Email: info@ejfoundation.org,
Website: www.ejfoundation.org
[This article first appeared in
Pesticides News No. 59, March 2003, pages 4-5]
|