We are delighted to report on a key victory won by those struggling with the
effects of endosulfan poisoning in Kerala, India. Over a 25-year period the Stateowned
plantation company used planes to spray endosulfan over cashew
plantations, despite their proximity to 12 villages. Although medical
documentation found fatal poisonings, mental and physical disabilities in children
born during this period, and health impacts in adults, the government denied
links with endosulfan spraying. However, the Chief Minister of the newly elected
State government has now granted immediate compensation to families of those
fatally poisoned and is putting in place a programme of long term support for
victims (
page 3).
However, not all news has been so positive. Those of us living in the UK will have
been taken aback by our government's flat rejection of the Royal Commission for
Environmental Pollution (RCEP) recommendations in its report 'Crop Spraying
and the Health of Residents and Bystanders'. Acknowledging a possible link
between chronic ill health and pesticide exposure, the RCEP recommended a
number of precautionary measures, most notably the provision of no-spray zones
between sprayed fields and residential areas. Not only have the government
rejected this, they have also have ruled out calls for a statutory requirement on
farmers to make spray records publicly available. Such information is vital for
doctors treating exposed patients. Farm records will be available at the farmer's
discretion, a situation that has historically failed to guarantee access (page 9).
The developing baby and newborn child are uniquely susceptible to chemical
exposures. Professor Janna Koppe reviews evidence that pesticides can cause
oxidative stress to the foetus and placenta and can affect the normal functioning
of hormone systems. These effects can increase foetal mortality and lead to a
range of chronic health conditions in later life, such as high blood pressure. She
provides pre-conception advice (page 4).
A recent study from California asked whether newborns were more sensitive to
organophosphate pesticides than their mothers.
When setting food tolerance standards in the
United States regulators can allow for a maximal
tenfold difference in sensitivity between adults and
children. That is they can reduce the levels of
pesticide residues allowed in food by up to tenfold
to protect children. In an interview with one of the
researchers, Professor Asa Bradman, he describes
how they found a 65-fold variation in sensitivity to
diazinon and a 164-fold variation in sensitivity to
chlorpyrifos (page 6). These results beg the
question - does current risk assessment protect our children?
The first announcement of results from the Drift Catcher (a device measuring
pesticides in air) was made in July. Measurements taken in the town of Lindsay,
California showed chlorpyrifos levels 7.9 times higher than the Reference
Exposure Level. The Drift Catcher provides a powerful tool for communities living
near sprayed areas to advocate peticide reduction (page 12).